Pages

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

J Suryakant High Court ordering destruction of High Court records and unreasoned orders ?



Registrar General,           Date; 20.2.2015
High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh.

Sub; Initiation of action under Contempt of Court Act;
Reg; Order of destruction of Recent Records.

Sir,

1.      Rules regarding designations of senior advocates were recently amended incorporating destruction of records and passing unreasoned orders. The aforesaid amendments are;-
3.(e)(ii)      Records of such papers be destroyed after the result is notified by obtaining orders of the Chief Justice.
3.(e)(iii)     Full court shall not be required to record reasons ..

2.      This is directly in conflict with Constitution of India and oath taken by the Judges;-
Constitution of India Article 215; High Courts to be courts of record.- Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.
Oath by a High Court Judge; .. I will uphold the Constitution..

3.      An order by a court of record to destroy its important recent records and passing unreasoned orders amounts to scandalizing this court and lowering its dignity. It is thus apparent that Judge Surya Kant who reportedly headed the committee has committed criminal contempt of this court.
2 (c) criminal contempt" means the publication (whether by words. spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representations, or otherwise) of any matter or the doing of any other act whatsoever which-
(i) scandalises or tends to scandalise, or lowers or tends to lower the authority of, any court; or
Prayer;-
By virtue of your office and duty to the High Court, you are obliged to place matter before the Acting Chief Justice to initiate suo moto action u/s contempt’s of courts act against Judge Suryakant/such other judge who was responsible for above act.

KD Aggarwal

Dignity of Judiciary cannot be lowered by whatever others may do or say.
It can only be lowered by the act and conduct of Judges themselves.

No comments:

Post a Comment