Judge Suryakant and theft of asstes from custody of High Court Chandigarh.

        Date; 27.10.2015

To, Honorable the Chief Justice of India,

Supreme Court, New Delhi  - 110001.

Sub; Judge Surya Kant Pb and Hy High Court Chandigarh.

Sir,

1.     Vide my letter Dt 31.8.09, I inter-alia informed the Company Judge that thefts of assets were going on in companies under liquidation whose custody is with H’ High Court as per 456(2) of Companies Act.

 2.    In response to my letter Dt 31.08.2009, reader liquidation vide statement Dt 9.11.2009 stated;

“The branch is working smoothly under the kind control/orders of Hon’ble the Company Judge and as per the Company Court rules, 1959 and guidelines by this court from time to time.”

Above statement was seen by the company judge Surya Kant. Roster changed thereafter.

3.     There is documentary evidence of thefts which occurred in the year 2012 and 2013. Few cases are;-

1.   Veekay Fibres Ltd In liqn.

2.   Hallmark healthcare Ltd in Liqn

3.   Organic Chemoils Ltd in liqn

4.   Mangla cotex Ltd in liqn

4.     I asked under RTI as to who was company Judge during 2012, 2013. PIO Pb & Hy High Court Vide letter No 1672 Dt 8.10.2015, informed that Judge Suryakant was the company Judge during 2012, 2013 (when above thefts occurred). 

5.     Sh ML Sharma ex-official Liquidator Bombay and de-facto owner of several security agencies informed me that he paid money in chambers to two judges of High Court i.e. Surya Kant and Rajive Bhalla. Reader liquidation has also implicated the company Judge in his statement Dt 9.11.09. Then company judge was Suryakant.

                                       

For information only and necessary action,

       

                                    K D Aggarwal