To
The
Registrar (General),
Punjab
& Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Subject: Complaint against Jagjit Singh,
Superintendent, Liquidation Branch, High Court.
Sir,
The instant complaint is in furtherance
to the previous averments of the undersigned against Jagjit Singh,
Superintendent, Liquidation Branch for demanding car (make; Mercedes) in lieu
of payment of his claim in the matter of M/s Altos India Ltd. This letter is
for placing further substantive material/evidence on record for proving his
often this kind of habit of acceptance of gifts from litigants/claimants
(falsely stated as ‘friends’) as he took in the year of 2003 and 2008 by way of
procuring a tour of England twice in said years in the name of his ‘friend’s’
son’s marriages.
The fact that DP Ojha official
Liquidator had sought 50% of fee and Jagjit Singh had sought Mercedes car as
‘sponsorship (gift)’ in lieu of payment in the matter of M/s Altos India Ltd.
was brought to the notice of High Court Authorities and MCA at relevant time.
The fact of collusion between Jagjit Singh and DP Ojha official liquidator
attached to High court wrt theft of assets from companies (In liqn), {several
running factories have disappeared}, payments in name of fictitious persons,
sales of land of companies (in liqn) at much below valuations, excess payments
by hiding norms, rules, Companies Act and orders passed by previous company
judges from later company judges and their violation by D P Ojha has already
been brought to notice of authorities alongwith documentary evidence.
Now in
addition and in support thereto the undersigned invites the attention of the
authorities that said Jagjit Singh, while posted in Liquidation Branch in the
year 2008, availed ex-india leave of two months for attending a two
days marriage of a friend’s son for visiting London only but infact said
Jagjit Singh also travelled to Rome and Paris and other European countries
despite he being not permitted to visit so and this fact can also be verified
from his Passport. Further the whole
expenditure of said tour including tickets etc. was gifted (sponsored) by so
called friend of Jagjit Singh, for which he was not entitled to accept and act
thereupon, as acceptance of any kind of gift or sponsorship from a private
person by any Government employee is prohibited and is a crime being evidence
of corruption and misuse of High Court job for personal benefit.
Earlier, also said Jagjit Singh has visited
England for a period of one month in the year 2003 and during his both visits
i.e. in the year 2003 & 2008 he never disclosed the sources of his
expenditure incurred, which infact were his self-created aboard tours in the
garb of said so-called marriages, especially in the year of 2008. Moreover, while visiting England second time
in the year 2008, he never placed on record the requisite Wedding Card of
alleged marriage for which he visited not only England but he also visited
other countries.
A man of common prudence can easily
understand that for touring a Country like England for atleast two months, in
the year of 2008, with wife, a minimum expenditure of atleast 5 lacs would have
been incurred, which said Jagjit Singh was supposed to disclose, which he never
did, as this man is in the habit of demanding gifts and sponsorships etc.,
which he demanded from me also as specified above by way of demanding car.
In view of above-detailed facts and
circumstances, it is requested that the matter in hand warrants a detailed
probe preferably by a Judicial Officer on the Establishment of this Court and a
stern action against said Jagjit Singh is required to be taken.
Thanking You.
Kapil
Dev Aggarwal
