traffic analytics

Justice is where Judges follow Law-KD Aggarwal. Powered by Blogger.

If Judgments were based on law, every lawyer will get same fees!-KD Aggarwal

Facts and Statute are Not Relevant. They are invented / concealed / amended by corrupt Judges - KD Aggarwal.

Let us make India Corruption free

The matter and inference drawn are based on actual personal experiences of Author. They are meant to serve as beacon to those who may find themselves in similar situations to save themselves from clutches of unscrupulous persons. They are also meant to serve as an eye opener to those men who are sitting at Helm of Affairs for improvement of judicial system and corruption free India, so that never again one says; "the law court is not a cathedral (what they used to be) but a casino where so much depends on the throw of the dice (and money). K R Narayanan http://www.krnarayanan.in/html/speeches/others/jan28_00.htm

Transparency improves Accountability

Every Judge is Public Servant and thus accountable for his acts. Transparency of Complaints against Judges and instant stringent action for perjury and violation of their oath will improve Dignity of Courts and Justice delivery.

Friday, April 22, 2016

Sunil chaudhary Registrar Judicial High Court, bonded labor



To,                                                                Date; May 14, 2015
Acting Chief Justice,
Punjab and Haryana high Court
Through Its Registrar General,

Sub; Satyemev Jayate / Duty to uphold Truth and Law
Does it apply to Sh Sunil Chowdhary- Registrar Judicial?

Sir,

1.     Vide letter Dt 2387 Dt 13.9.2012, (copy enclosed as A), Sh Sunil Choudhary declined me inspection of COCP 2085/2011 (re-num. CP 53/12) on the ground that I am a stranger. The order was in violation of Rule 3 of Vol 5 Ch V-A of High Court rules and Orders under which a stranger can inspect any file with permission of court and I had applied permission under rule 3. The case pertained to false claim of Rs 1.5 crores in name of persons never been born. Copy of enquiry report is enclosed as B. A perusal of COCP 2085/11 (CP 53/12) would reveal that my name is mentioned in Para 13, 14, 15 of CP 53/12 and Para 19, 20, 21, 25, 30, 32 of reply. My letters are annexed by both the parties. Being a stranger I was entitled to inspection with permission though I am no stranger to the case. Violation of rule 3 by Sh Sunil Choudhary was with intent to commit/ facilitate/encourage fraud by J Suryakant in ordering payments in name of persons who have never been born in all other cases. J Surya kant passed two orders on 11.1.2012 in COCP 2085/11(CP 53/12) which are not bonafide. Scam was prevented in this case, only because, I was following this matter closely which is listed today.

2.     Vide order Dt 22.4.2015 (copy enclosed) Sh Sunil Choudhary declined copy of letter Dt 6.5.05 on the ground that I am a stranger to the case. The order is in violation of Rule 2 (iii) of Vol 5 Ch V-B of High Court rules and Orders. The letter by Chief justice B K Roy related to post script order of J Surya Kant dt 14.2.05 in CWP 6916/04. The request of its placement on judicial record and order of the then H’ CJ to place it on judicial record was with object that its certified copy can be obtained u/r 2iii being related to orders passed in above case. The case related to challenge of govt. allotment of 5.86 acres of land @ Rs 900 sq yards whereas three years to this allotment adjacent land was allotted to Bar Council of India @ Rs 5,800 per sq yards. 2 sons of a judge were prime stakeholders of allottee. Violation of rule 2iii by Sh Sunil Choudhary was with intent to hide / facilitate/encourage fraud by J Suryakant of passing orders favoring kith and kin of judges.                                             

3.     I may before concluding add that I have no personal grudge against Sh Sunil Choudhary and nor his illegal denials affected me in any manner. I inspected paperbook of COCP 2085/11 (CP53/12) from a colleague and orders are on website. J Surya Kant himself admitted in open court on 2.5.2012 that he had passed two orders on 11.1.2012 in above case. The letter Dt 6.5.2005 of Chief Justice [retd] is available with several advocates, journalists, social media and internet. Copy of the same is enclosed herewith. It was also published in newspapers and can be seen at following link;

4.     The only purpose of this letter is that public servants and particularly those associated with High Court should not do anything illegal at asking of someone or even otherwise and nor should they consider any individual as their master. Their master and employer is the society. Their duty is to uphold the constitution and the Laws; same as any other employee. They should not become accessory to a crime or fraud by any other employee even if he is a Judge. World can become a better place if we do our duty honestly like Salman khan’s body guard who till his last breath confirmed that Salman was driving the car and he was drunk. He realized that duty of his job is to protect his employer from outside attack but not to shield him if he does a crime. The world needs more such persons.

Hence this letter that law requires some action against Sunil Choudhary that can convey a message to all employees of high Court that their duty is to uphold the constitution and the laws and not to shield any other employee if he commits a crime even if he is a judge.

For information and necessary action.


In service of nation,

KD Aggarwal

No comments:

Post a Comment