minimum education in politics will improve literacy.

The Chief Justice and Date; October 1^st, 2015
brother Judges of India, 

Supreme Court of India, New Delhi.

Sub: Is Supreme Court anti development?

Sir,

Is education bad? How do we make 100% literacy or at least make an attempt towards 100% literacy? In India people are more interested in politics than in education. By prescribing minimum education for politics, we are only encouraging people to get educated for their own benefit.

And yet when after much demand from public such a law is formulated, then it is stayed. We remember that some time back, Courts had made CNG Autos compulsory even though 80 % of autos were diesel run and most autowalas had no money to switch to CNG. But still all autos switched to CNG though at much trouble for several thousand poor autowalas.

By prescribing minimum education for politics we the public are only attempting to do what RTE could not do. Social media is Indian form of jury of developed legal system of western countries. Supreme Court has been heavily criticized for staying minimum education in politics. Is the Supreme Court of India sending out a message that it is against development of India? Enclosed are few excerpts from the following link which are self speaking and evidences the great fall in image and dignity of Supreme court due its stay order on minimum education in politics;-

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Haryana-govt-refuses-to-drop-educational-qualification-criteria-in-panchayat-polls/articleshow/ 49055948.cms

For information and necessary action.

In service of nation,

KD Aggarwal

“Haryana’s stand is very appreciable. As of now, it is the husbands who remain defacto sarpanch and majority of the women are just show pieces with practically no say in the village matter. The husbands steal the money and the illiterate wives just put their signature. When things go wrong, it is the woman who go to jails. If education of the person is made compulsory, only capable women will fight election and will think ten times before agreeing to sign blindly. 

The SC has some real intelligent judges who came to sit on top without education or fake certificate, hence support for illiterate people in elections

Minimum educational criteria should be there for Politicians to contest elections. Uneducated Politicians spoil the economic growth of a country. We should also ponder over the existence of Rajya Sabha at Central and legislative council at states, as these are used for back door entries. Only elected people should be there to run the Government.

Even if constitution doesn't support the State Govt decision, SC should ask the Parliament to amend the constitution to fix minimum education qualifications for all level of elections. The day law of 'Education as a Fundamental Right' was passed, since than this should have been implemented to promote need of education.

A good step by Haryana Govt which not only will raise the standard of education, making people aware towards development of their villages by taking active part. Supreme Court should not have interfered in this matter, rather it should have supported the state govt which other states must be ordered to follow.

It is amazing - the SC is still of the view, 67 years after independence, that we should NOT have a law for minimum educational qualifications. It is not even possible, to be a peon in the government (including the Supreme Court, or even a Haryana Panchayat) without a minimum educational qualification.

WHY should we not provide for such a requirement for contesting for public office? The whole case sounds frivolous.

Only graduates should be eligible to contests all types of elections then our nation will become developed nation.

Educated person honour educated person, genius recognizes genius, uneducated recognize uneducated person, pig loves pigs, Uneducated lawyers/advocates (lowest in the merit and ethics) loves same kind items, so Indian judicial system would love and recognize whom? None but p!gs and uneducated items.

Jiska koi hai nahi goti, usne karne lagi Vakalati (those who got chance nowhere in the world and are of lowest in the merit, ethics as well as character come to the law profession). Indian Judicial system is occupied by such kind of lowest grade items. They will not allow Country to be educated.

Supreme court is advocating illiteracy. if anyone wants to serve the public he should know what is required of him , an illiterate person will be nothing but a passive participant to say the least . This will give rise to goons and mafia enter the politics.

SC should stay within limits. Let Govt do its Job. If we say there should not be education bar for courts then what happen.

Is the court in cloud cuckoo land? Is it not desirable to have people with education and resulting openness to new ideas?  Or are they wishing the Khap style should continue unabated?  What a sorry state of affairs.

The Honorable SC should re-consider its decision. Educational qualification should be must for persons in Public administration. Contesting election is not the only criteria but running the Panchayat well for the benefit of the masses should be the outlook.

Salute to Haryana. Educational criteria should be fixed for all elections not only panchayat.

Time to confront judiciary. The country can be run by elected law makers and not by unaccountable judiciary .

If SC don’t honor Haryana Government decisions, select thumb impression people for Judges in SC as well.”

Note by author and compiler; Dignity of courts is in hands of Judges. Judges should not pass any orders which lower the dignity of courts.

                                                                                      -KD Aggarwal