To,
1. The H’ Acting Chief Justice,
Punjab
and Haryana high Court, Chandigarh
2. Sh.
Sundeep Singh, Registrar Administration,
Punjab
and Haryana high Court, Chandigarh
3. Sh SC Malik, PIO, P & H High Court.
Sub;
RTI/AA495 order Dt 27.07.2015.
Sir,
Kindly
refer to my letter addressed to H’ the chief Justice dated 1.6.2015 requesting
that above appeal be listed before any other authority. The apprehensions
contained in my letter have since been proved true. The subject order is not
based on legal consideration but result of influence/fear of J Surya Kant.
Details are hereunder;-
Sh Sundeep Singh has referred to an order whereby details
of Judges medical expenses were denied by Judges of Supreme Court. (How can a
judge be a Judge in a case involving judges, (beats common sense)?) Indian jury
its social media said this about that order;
Concealment
leads to adverse inference. Judges cannot be a judge in their own cause. The
only way to keep their disease or medical treatment a secret would be to incur
expenses from personal account. Anything which is paid out of public account is
and should be subject to public scrutiny.
Unless
the desired information referred to some personal medical disease of J Surya
Kant, the aforesaid order (though a nullity) cannot be applied. The information
sought related to his leave application for October 10/11, 2013 which led to
killing of a young girl. Similarly it is strange coincidence that he took leave
for 5.2.2015 when collegiums had met to discuss transfers and postings of high
court judges. Leave/tour applications were not related to any medical disease
of J Surya Kant. It is thus inferred that the order was out of fear/influence
of j Surya kant. The following averment and article 14 of constitution also not
applied;-
“copy
of leave / tour application of J Surya kant for October 2013 and 5.2.2015 on
the ground that it is personal information but he supplied copy of leave
application of J Rajive Bhalla vide letter No 532 Dt 3.4.2012 (copy enclosed).
Order of PIO No 668 Dt 19.5.2015 is
thus discriminatory & violative of article 14 constitution of India.”
Sh
Sundeep Singh Registrar Administration, Sh Sunil Choudhary Registrar Judicial
and PIO SC Malik cannot be trusted for giving any information relating to a
controversial J. Surya Kant. In modern times bonded labour / slaves are not
found in some brick-kiln in some remote village of some backward area but in
the heart of temple of Justice among above named persons/ Registrars of this
high Court.
KD
Aggarwal.
Copy;
Sh Sunil Choudhary, Registrar Judicial P & H HC on 18.10.2015.
You
had hidden letter of chief justice Dt 6.5.2005 and orders thereon by another
Chief justice Dt 6.5.2005 both of which are part judicial record being CWP
6916/2004, certified copy of which is available to a stranger under Rule 2
(iii) of Vol 5 Ch V-B of High Court rules and Orders. The letter by Chief
justice B K Roy related to post script order of J Surya Kant dt 14.2.05 in CWP
6916/04. The case related to challenge of govt. allotment of 5.86 acres of land @ Rs 900 sq yards
whereas three years to this allotment, adjacent land was allotted to Bar
Council of India @ Rs 5,800 per sq yards. 2 sons of a judge were prime
stakeholders of allottee. First order pronounced in open court
quashed the allotment but post script order of J Suryakant dismissed the writ
itself amounting to interference in administration of justice in addition to criminal
offense of fabricating orders of High Court.
Desire
to hide anything means that you are afraid and fear is bad. Only bonded
labourers are known to work under fear.
KD
Aggarwal.
No comments:
Post a Comment