national biometric Data useful tool to identify criminals.

Bio-meric data stored on national adhaar card is a useful means to curb crime and identify criminals. finger prints lifted from crime scene when compared with national adhaar card data can help identify criminala and curb crime. in this context I wrote a letter dt 5.2.2016 seeking information under RTI as under;-

PIO,
Chandigarh Police headquarters,
Sector 9, Chandigarh. 

Jai Hind,
 
Kindly supply me with following information under RTI;-
 
1.          Total number of cases where finger prints were lifted from crime scene by police authorities in cases of theft / robbery and murder.

2.          No of cases Where finger prints were checked and or matched from national Adhaar card data?

3.          Total number of cases other that theft robbery and murder where finger prints were lifted by Investigation officers from crime scene?

4.          Whether there is any dedicated evidence retrieval team with Chandigarh police?

In service of nation;
SD/-
KD Aggarwal.

In response to above query, DSP Crime vide his letter Dt 9.2.2016 stated that 268 cases of theft, 04 cases of murders and 02 cases of robbery and 07 other cases were dealt with mobile forensic team of Chandigarh police during 2013 to 2015.

In the reply number of cases where finger prints were lifted were not told and neither whether any finger prints were sent compared with national adhaar card data.

In a related development;

National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) chief Ish Kumar said nearly 50 lakh cases are registered across the country every year. out of which 80-85% of the offenders are first-timers without any police record "Limited access" to Aadhaar data will help police trace first-time offenders and unidentified bodies: 
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ncrb-chief-give-police-limited-access-to-aadhaar-data/articleshow/64689171.cms

Dear CJI Bring Back Dignity of Law.

To,                    9.01.2016

Hon’ble Chief Justice Of India,

Supreme Court of India, New Delhi.

Sub; If Judgment were based on law every lawyer will get same fees.

Ref; Statement of H’ CJI; “lawyers should improve their dignity”.

Sir,

Apropos the statement made by H’ Chief Justice of India on 8^th January, 2016 at Bar Council of India, lawyers will have value when law has value. Both Law and lawyers lose value when Judges decide cases on the basis of face value or kith and kin. Now, one can know the judgment just by weighing the names of advocates and name of judge.  The heavier influential advocate gets the judgment in his favor. There is no need to even read the judgment. When judges start giving value to law, the lawyers will automatically have value.

Even on NJAC; consultation means consultation, period. Neither Dictate nor Primacy. Govt should consult the CJI but that's it. Information shared during consultation is valuable but not binding. CJI in the garb of consultation cannot dictate Government even under pre-amended Constitution. But then who will impeach the judges, who violate constitution. For judiciary to be free from influence of corruption, nepotism and sycophancy, they need to be appointed by people independent of judiciary.

        The situation is such that Constitution/Central/State Acts are daily amended. Facts are either concealed, changed or outright lies are spoken in judgments and orders. Perjury is common in judgments and orders. ‘Day’ is interpreted as ‘night’ or ‘evening’, ‘X’ as ‘Y’, ‘Z’ is brought in out of blue which is against records. Any order or judgment involving amendment of ‘Act’ or manipulation/concealment of ‘fact’, outright lies or perjury be treated as violation of oath of office / criminal misconduct involving moral turpitude. The judge be arrested and no bail be granted. But reverse is happening. Anyone who points out corruption in Judges is at once handed out notice of criminal contempt. When exposing crime is treated as a crime then we are ruled by criminals.

Kindly bring back dignity of Law and Judiciary. Lawyer’s dignity will automatically follow. If Judgment were based on law every lawyer will get same fees. Only then Judiciary, law and lawyers will have dignity.

                                                                        In service of nation,

                                                                        KD Aggarwal

minimum education in politics will improve literacy.

The Chief Justice and Date; October 1^st, 2015
brother Judges of India, 

Supreme Court of India, New Delhi.

Sub: Is Supreme Court anti development?

Sir,

Is education bad? How do we make 100% literacy or at least make an attempt towards 100% literacy? In India people are more interested in politics than in education. By prescribing minimum education for politics, we are only encouraging people to get educated for their own benefit.

And yet when after much demand from public such a law is formulated, then it is stayed. We remember that some time back, Courts had made CNG Autos compulsory even though 80 % of autos were diesel run and most autowalas had no money to switch to CNG. But still all autos switched to CNG though at much trouble for several thousand poor autowalas.

By prescribing minimum education for politics we the public are only attempting to do what RTE could not do. Social media is Indian form of jury of developed legal system of western countries. Supreme Court has been heavily criticized for staying minimum education in politics. Is the Supreme Court of India sending out a message that it is against development of India? Enclosed are few excerpts from the following link which are self speaking and evidences the great fall in image and dignity of Supreme court due its stay order on minimum education in politics;-

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Haryana-govt-refuses-to-drop-educational-qualification-criteria-in-panchayat-polls/articleshow/ 49055948.cms

For information and necessary action.

In service of nation,

KD Aggarwal

“Haryana’s stand is very appreciable. As of now, it is the husbands who remain defacto sarpanch and majority of the women are just show pieces with practically no say in the village matter. The husbands steal the money and the illiterate wives just put their signature. When things go wrong, it is the woman who go to jails. If education of the person is made compulsory, only capable women will fight election and will think ten times before agreeing to sign blindly. 

The SC has some real intelligent judges who came to sit on top without education or fake certificate, hence support for illiterate people in elections

Minimum educational criteria should be there for Politicians to contest elections. Uneducated Politicians spoil the economic growth of a country. We should also ponder over the existence of Rajya Sabha at Central and legislative council at states, as these are used for back door entries. Only elected people should be there to run the Government.

Even if constitution doesn't support the State Govt decision, SC should ask the Parliament to amend the constitution to fix minimum education qualifications for all level of elections. The day law of 'Education as a Fundamental Right' was passed, since than this should have been implemented to promote need of education.

A good step by Haryana Govt which not only will raise the standard of education, making people aware towards development of their villages by taking active part. Supreme Court should not have interfered in this matter, rather it should have supported the state govt which other states must be ordered to follow.

It is amazing - the SC is still of the view, 67 years after independence, that we should NOT have a law for minimum educational qualifications. It is not even possible, to be a peon in the government (including the Supreme Court, or even a Haryana Panchayat) without a minimum educational qualification.

WHY should we not provide for such a requirement for contesting for public office? The whole case sounds frivolous.

Only graduates should be eligible to contests all types of elections then our nation will become developed nation.

Educated person honour educated person, genius recognizes genius, uneducated recognize uneducated person, pig loves pigs, Uneducated lawyers/advocates (lowest in the merit and ethics) loves same kind items, so Indian judicial system would love and recognize whom? None but p!gs and uneducated items.

Jiska koi hai nahi goti, usne karne lagi Vakalati (those who got chance nowhere in the world and are of lowest in the merit, ethics as well as character come to the law profession). Indian Judicial system is occupied by such kind of lowest grade items. They will not allow Country to be educated.

Supreme court is advocating illiteracy. if anyone wants to serve the public he should know what is required of him , an illiterate person will be nothing but a passive participant to say the least . This will give rise to goons and mafia enter the politics.

SC should stay within limits. Let Govt do its Job. If we say there should not be education bar for courts then what happen.

Is the court in cloud cuckoo land? Is it not desirable to have people with education and resulting openness to new ideas?  Or are they wishing the Khap style should continue unabated?  What a sorry state of affairs.

The Honorable SC should re-consider its decision. Educational qualification should be must for persons in Public administration. Contesting election is not the only criteria but running the Panchayat well for the benefit of the masses should be the outlook.

Salute to Haryana. Educational criteria should be fixed for all elections not only panchayat.

Time to confront judiciary. The country can be run by elected law makers and not by unaccountable judiciary .

If SC don’t honor Haryana Government decisions, select thumb impression people for Judges in SC as well.”

Note by author and compiler; Dignity of courts is in hands of Judges. Judges should not pass any orders which lower the dignity of courts.

                                                                                      -KD Aggarwal

The lahore family of Advocates who came to Shimla in 1947

1. Mela Ram Aggarwal> Raj Kumar Aggarwal> Kapil Dev Aggarwal

2. Shambu  Lal Puri     > Munisher Lal Puri

                                     Rameshwar Puri

3. Mukund lal Puri      > Keshav Ram Puri, Not advocate >       
                                   daughters' son     Rajinder Sachhar

4. Anand Mohan Suri   > Lalit Mohan Suri      > Deepak Suri

                                     Ravinder Suri          > Rohit Suri

5. Prabhu Dass Suri > Vinod Suri     > Vivek Suri

6. Dwarka Nath Aggarwal >  R N Aggarwal 

7. Yash Pal Gandhi > Vijay Pal Gandhi  

8. Jhanda Singh      > Daljit Singh          

                                Jasbir singh  >

9. Bhagwat Dayal > Yogeshwar Dayal  

10. Fakir Chand Mittal   > S C Mittal               

11. Harbans lal Sarin     > M L Sarin      >

                                   > Ranjit lal Sarin

12. Hira lal Sibal  >   Kapil Sibal  >

                              >   J K Sibal  > Vivek Sibal

13. H R Sodhi     >        N K Sodhi    

14. Som Dutt Bahri > Davinder Lal Bahri Jullandhar

                                 > Amrit lal Bahri

                                 > P K Bahri Delhi HC Judge

15. Shamer C. Mittal>Kapur Chand Mittal>G C Mittal HCJ>Nipun Mittal

                                    > Sq leader >Ajay Mittal HCJ

16. Chiranji Lal Aggarwal> 

                                          

17. Amar Nath Grover   >

18. M C Mahajan CJI > D K Mahajan HCJ > Chander Krishan Mahajan HCJ

19. Nanak Chand pandit > P C Pandit HCJ

20. Shamsher Bahadur. HCJ

21. Kundan lal Gosain.> Narender Goswami

22. Teja Singh > Gurdev Singh HCJ

23. R C Soni >                        

24. R P Khosla   

Note1; Names are not mentioned in any particular seniority but the way they were told by my father who began his practice at Shimla in 1947 and was thus conversant with all those who came to Punjab high Court at Shimla from Lahore.

Note2; List of children and grand children in practise as advocates may not be complete. any suggestion / information shall be welcome. 


Kapil Dev Aggarwal, Advocate.