Common Pool Fund of Official Liquidator

Common Pool Fund of Official Liquidator.

Common Pool fund is an account established under Orders of Honorable High Court and its funds are under the control and management of the Honorable high Court. 

There is no provision for such an account in Companies Act which normally lays down that assets of the Companies be sold within one year. Official Liquidators have no knowledge of Companies act or how to liquidate the Companies within the stipulated period, hence they proposed such an account to meet expenses.

It comprises 10% of interest income received on investments of sale proceeds of assets of various companies which is transferred to Common pool fund.

As per letter Dt 9th august 2011 from Official Liquidator, Chandigarh, balance in its common pool fund was Rs 28,335,155/-.

The funds of this account are to paid under Order's of Honorable High Court. The purpose is to apportion expenses of the staff, Chartered accountants, Valuers, advocates, etc or such other expenses as may be ordered by the High Court to be paid from this account.

Kapil Dev Aggarwal.

Oath of a High Court Judge.

Justice Kant filed complaint with H' Chief Justce that author has fabricated the above oath and thereby committed contempt of Court. he stated as under;-

 “Mr K. D. Aggarwal also enclosed a photocopy of the oath Format after scrapping the phrase “do solemnly affirm”.

Facts as per Records;

Apart from issue of common sense (or lack of it), A bare perusal of Oath of Office (Annexure P/6a) shows that there is an oblique mark between the two options “do swear in the name of god’ / “do solemnly affirm” Oath can only be under one option and in this case it was under “do swear in the name of god’ and hence the other option “do solemnly affirm” was struck off by the Office. Justice Surya Kant has deliberately made false statements (or he forgot his oath of office). By knowingly making false statements in judicial records Justice Surya Kant has brought the Institution in disrepute and scandalized the Hon’ble High Court.

State of Nation.

In an apparent Quid pro quo, ex-CJI Sh Kapadia gave his full support in corruption to Manmohan Singh aka Sonia's Congress  by hinting that CAG figures Coal scam of corruption and loss may not be true. When did CJI examined Coal scam ? When did CJI issued notice and heard CAG before saying its figures were wrong? Who authorized him to calculate the loss to Public money regarding illegal allotment of Coal Blocks.

What CJI meant was you do not ask for our accountability we will not ask yours.

Judicial Accountability bill goes down the drain. Jan Lok Pal Bill is already in the drain.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Coalgate-figures-may-not-be-accurate-hints-Chief-Justice-of-India-S-H-Kapadia/articleshow/16508783.cms?

Judiciary is not seen in the picture under threat of "contempt" of court;

In democracy, no one can be above LAW.

Jagan Nath B K Jagan & Co. Sector 28, Chandigarh used her daughter to save son from bankruptcy.

Jagan Nath of Jagan Hardware and B K jagan and Company, sector 28, Chandigarh lied in court of law and used her daughter to loot Rs 5 crores from family of Kapil Dev Aggarwal to save his son from bankruptcy. 

Following is part of Public Records contained in Criminal Appeal 713 of 2001 in High Court of New Delhi;

1.     That the Jagan nath appeared as witness in case and While appearing as PW-3 on behalf of the Rajni on 16.3.98 & 4.4.88 he swore to state the truth but however he made various statements in the court which were false and which he knew to be false to his knowledge. He thus committed an offense of perjured by deliberately giving false evidence. The statements which were made by the Jagan nath under oath knowing them to be false are as reproduced hereunder:-   
Jagan Nath Lies 1

2.     "She was not allowed to talk on telephone with her parents. She cautioned us many times not to have telephonic talk with her because later on she is being abused and\harassed by the Me. 

PROOF OF FALSITY

It has been stated by the Rajni (Rajni) in her cross examination as follows: - "After separation of the kitchen my brother in law S.C.Diwan also gave me telephone connection which was lying unused with them. I got it affixed in my bed room. After installation of the telephone I was free to use the telephone in the manner I desired".

It has been proved by RW5 Naresh Kumar Section supervisor Office of General Manager telephones that telephone bearing No. 691671 of S.C.Diwan was installed on 6.1.94 which continued right uptil 15.9.95. Jagan nath Jagan Nath states:-"I was always on talking terms with my daughter"

Jagan Nath Lies 2
3.    "I do not know whether the Rajni and Kapil were having separate Kitchen and residence in the house on the first floor since Nov.1993 or not.

PROOF OE FALSITY

Rajni has stated as under on oath: - "It is correct that after separation of kitchen in October 1993, meal of myself and also of my husband was cooked separately and that of my in laws separately. On the ground floor only my parents in law were residing. Since I never interfered, I do not know who the visitors to them were. Those visitors never met me".

Jagan nath Jagan Nath states:-"I was always on talking terms with my daughter" Jagan nath Jagan admits letter Exhibit D-17 written by Rajni. In this letter Dt. 38.12.93 Jagan nath Rajni has stated:-" He (my husband) says that he has left/separated from his parents because of me, Papa he his right.

Jagan Nath Lies 3

4.  "I do not want to disclose the contents of the cash etc. recovered at that time (during Income Tax raids) without consulting my income tax lawyer.  Out of the amount so recovered by the department some of the amount was of Sai Baba Trust which was so stated by me to the officers.

PROOF OF FALSITY

Statement of Jagan Nath:- "I am devotee of Sai Baba but I am not member of Sai Baba Trust". The officers repeatedly called for any independent confirmation from any other member of SAI SAMITI but no confirmation could be given since Jagan nath had misused the name of LORD for monetary wrongful personal gain.

Jagan Nath Lies 4

5a.    "The Rajni never disclosed or discussed with me various destinations she was taken by the Kapil for Honeymoon or other trips.  I do not know where Rajni was taken for honeymoon to Kinnour in May 1993, April 93 to Delhi(Hotel Le-meridian); June 1993 to Missouri, June 1994 to Mashhobara, Dec 1994 to Narkanda; June 1995 to Kasuli, July 1995 to Simla and Sept;1995 they were booked for hotel Hadimba Palace at Manali.  I do not know for Dec.1995 they were booked fob Andaman and Nikobar Islands. She did not tell me about the gifts given to her on her birthdays, marriage Anniversary by the respondent".

5b.    "After the marriage my daughter was unhappy as her in laws house and she used to complain to me that you have married me in a family which was of low mentality and used to abuse her, beat her, and were coercing her to bring more dowry"

PROOF OF FALSITY

In para 5b of her replication dt. 7.11.97 Rajni has admitted to having gone to all the above places with respondent. Statement of Jagan nath Jagan Nath:- I was always on talking terms with my daughter".

Jagan nath states:- "It is correct that after satisfying myself with regard to the financial status of the respondent, I arranged this marriage. I verified about the reputation of the Family with regard to integrity and behavior and it was informed to me that they have good reputation".

Contents of para 5a and its admission by Rajni read with para 4 above automatically prove the contents of above para 5b FALSE.

Jagan Nath Lies 5
6.  "I cannot identify the handwriting of my (daughter) Rajni. I do not remember as to how many times I went to meet her after Nov, 1993. I do not remember whether I went alone or accompanied my wife or my son during that period of Nov.1993 to Sept,1995.  It is wrong to suggest that there was separate stairs as well from outside the house for going to the first floor in the house of the respondent.  I cannot say whether the photograph mark "A" to "F" pertains the house of the respondent". My daughter alone has instructed Mr.Jain his counsel to file the present petition.  I never associated with her.  It is correct that Mr.V.K.jain, Advocate is practicing at Patiala court.  I do not know who drafted the first petition. I never accompanied my daughter to the lawyer.  I am not aware as to whether my daughter was having medical problems or not This fact (Her medical treatment) was not disclosed to me by the Rajni.  After filing of written statement, I came to know that the Rajni was got treated by the her husband.  I did not enquire from the Rajni in this behalf because it is very difficult for a father to inquire.  If my wife had inquired I do not know because she never told me".

PROOF OF FALSITY

Rajni admittedly is the daughter of the witness. Jagan Nath states:-"I was always on talking terms with my daughter. It is wrong to suggest that I and my wife never treated the Rajni with love and affection". It is not possible for any father that he does not know the medical problems of her daughter as every week she used to be in Hospital for one operation or another and none from her family ever accompanied her. The above statements are false on their face.

Jagan Nath Lies 6

7.  "It is correct that my wife Murti Devi is operating a locker in Harco bank  Chandigarh  and another in State Bank of India at Panchkula.  I do not know that the locker at Panchkula was taken by my wife in the name of my daughter Anuradha.   It is correct that the locker number in the name of my wife in Harco Bank is number 13.  I cannot tell the date or period since when she is having this locker.  I cannot admit or deny that The locker is in operation for the last 20 years".

PROOF OF FALSITY

Murti devi is admittedly the only wife of Jagan nath.

Jagan Nath Lies 7
8.       She (Rajni) was not being provided with enough food, clothing. 

PROOF OF FALSITY  

Statement of Jagan Nath "Even after the complaint of food and clothing by the Rajni, I did not enquire from her about income of respondent.  I was always on talking terms with my daughter. Rajni did not tell me that after marriage her husband had three telephones and one fax machine. It has been proved by RW 8 Sh. S.M. Sharma officer Bank of Rajasthan that Cheque No. 711452 was drawn by her husband from his bank account on M/s Nippy Jeweler for a sum of Rs, 9800/- which was en cashed through Bank clearing Cheque being Account payee Cheque. Statement of Bank account is Ex.D31 and  copy of cheque of Dx. D32. Another witness RW 10  Sh. Ranbir Singh Officer Punjab National Bann Sector 37 has proved cheque issued on name of Sham Sunder Kapoor (Proprietor Nippy Jeweler) Ex.D36. This cheque was encash by RW17 Rahul Kumar helper Nippy Jeweler who has proved his signatures on the cheque as Ex.D44. This cheque was for a sum of Rs, 12,000/-. Copy of the bill is Exhibit D-45.

Jagan Nath Lies 8
9.     After one year of the marriage the father-in-law of the "Rajni present in the court used to call her as a "Kamini" and "Banj".

PROOF OF FALSITY

Rajni never alleges that she was called "kamini". Rajni admits that she was living separately from her in-laws after 2 months of marriage.

Jagan Nath Lies 9
12.   My son is under graduate.  I cannot say whether he studied in college or school  but it was upto 12th standard.  I cannot tell whether he failed or not in any class.

PROOF OF FALSITY

Gopal is admittedly the only son of Jagan nath.

Jagan Nath Lies 10
13.    The Rajni was working with S.C. dewan, chartered Accountant. I cannot say whether she worked before separation or after separation.

PROOF OF FALSITY

Admittedly Rajni after separation is living with Jagan Nath.

Jagan Nath Lies 11

14.     "I do not remember at the moment for the last 8 years whether I have any shares in that Jagan Nath Brij Kumar Pvt. Limited;  I am director in that company till today". 

PROOF OF FALSITY

As per the records maintained in the office of Registrar of Companies only sh. Raj Singal and father of Raj Singal are the directors of Jagan Brij Pvt. Limited; 

Jagan Nath Lies 12
15.    "I do not remember whether the children of Anuradha from second marriage were born in Deep Nursing Home. I do not know whether the children of Pardeep were born at A.G Clinic and nursing home at sector 28, Chandigarh." 

PROOF OF FALSITY

Admittedly Anuradha is the daughter of Jagan nath Jagan whose child was born at Deep Nursing Home on 1992-93. Pardeep is partner of Jagan nath Jagan/his wife Murti whose child was born at A.G. clinic. Jagan Nath passes through the front of A.G. clinic everyday when he goes to his shop in sec. 28.                                                                             

Jagan Nath Lies 13
16.    "It is wrong to suggest that I and my wife never treated the Rajni with love and affection."

PROOF OF FALSITY  

Jagan nath states:- "I did not make any effort for her higher studies after separation till date. This fact (Her medical treatment) was not disclosed to me by the Rajni.  After filing of written statement, I came to know that the Rajni was got treated by her husband.  I did not inquire from the Rajni in this behalf because it is very difficult for a father to inquire.  If my wife had inquired I do not know because she never told me".

Rajni admits-"Only my husband accompanied me whenever I went to the Doctor for treatment with regard to fertility. The expenses in that regard were also met by my husband."

Jagan Nath Lies 14

17.      It is further wrong to suggest that the present petition has been filed at my instance as I do not want Rajni to settle.  It is further wrong to suggest that I have sold off the jewellery given by the respondents and his parents to the Rajni have also been sold off by me.  It is further wrong to suggest that I and my wife always interfered in the married life of the Rajni.  It is further wrong to suggest that I have misappropriate the income of the and ancestral gold worth 30.00 lacs of her husband and his parents.

Proof of falsity of entire statements by testimonies of independent witnesses.

Testimony of Late Sh.B.L.Premi, Assistant Branch

Manager, PNB Sector 37, Chandigarh.

Testimony of Dr.Inderjit Dewan. Prof. Emeritus.

Testimony of Sh.S.K.Mishra.

Testimony of Sh.Pavitar Kumar.

Click here for;

What I Did not Knew nor could imagine.

Dates and Events.

Inlaws Indebtedness.

Proof of Theft by Rajni her Brother and Father

False Allegations to Loot Money

What happened in Appeal.

How her father lied 

How her brother lied 

How Brij lied.

Kapil Dev Aggarwal

How executive could control Inflation?

How can we control Inflation? 

There are several measures that can be taken to effectively control inflation before it gets out of hand. Given that inflation is a result of cost push or demand pull functions in economy and imbalance between supply and demand of goods and services at current prices, so measures be taken to reduce costs and demand and increase supply of goods and services. Following measures in this regard are suggested;-

THE SUPPLY SIDE;

  

a) Increased Production;

The supply of goods and services can be increased by increasing Industrial and Agricultural production. Agricultural production can be increased by providing an adequate supply of agricultural inputs at low prices, modernization of agricultural, scientific farm management, adequate water supply for irrigation etc. Similarly Industrial production can be increased by giving incentives for increased production, foreign direct investment, credit growth fiscal concession etc.

b) Reducing costs of Production;

Reducing cost of debt; - decreased interest rates on Industrial and Agricultural loans.

Reducing labor cost; - Reducing minimum wage thus inviting more entrepreneurs into production.

Reducing price of raw materials; -, Lots of raw material is supplied by or is under control of Government or Politicians like mining products or by freeing imports from duties and tariffs.

Reducing prices of Gas, Energy, transportation etc will lead to lower costs of production and supply there nullifying cost push inflation. 

c) Control of Illegal Activities;

There are some illegal activities that cause significant inflation in economy. It is hoarding, smuggling, profiteering, black marketing etc. In the case of smuggling of large staples of sugar, butter, wheat rice etc are exported illegally in order to obtain higher prices. Similarly the shortage in most cases are artificially created to increase profits. All such activities must be controlled through advertisements, giving rewards to informants, and punishments to offenders.

d) Price and Security;

Production and distribution of goods can be affected due to existence of unease and insecurity or disorder in society. In such circumstances, investors are hesitant to invest for fear of potential loss. Similarly, the production of Industrial products is affected due to several unpleasant events such as strikes, public disorder, rallies riots etc. Therefore peace and security must be ensured to maintain regular supply of goods and services.

e) Maintain Energy Resources;

The supply of agricultural and industrial products is highly dependent on energy availability. If the energy availability is irregular or expensive it will adversely affect supply and its costs and will become expensive. Increased costs causes inflation. Therefore all necessary measures be taken to provide regular supply of major sources of energy to agricultural and industrial sector at constant costs.

THE DEMAND SIDE;

a) Control of Money Supply;

The money supply has great influence on rising inflation that is, money supply increases demand and thereby increases inflation and vise verse. Therefore to control inflation, measures must be taken to control money supply. The money supply can be controlled with the help of Monetary policy in which Central Bank of a Country uses various methods, such as Bank Rate policy, open market operations, changing reserve requirements, credit rationing, direct market intervention etc. All these methods are useful to control inflation in a country.

b) There is no deficit Financing;

Deficit financing shows that public is spending beyond their income. To some extent it will lead to development but it will also lead to inflation. Deficit financing is used to finance additional costs of budget deficit. This leads to increased money supply in economy. Therefore deficit financing should be discouraged and all developmental financing should be met through taxes and debt sale.

c) Population control;

In most developing countries, the population is increasing very quickly, whereas production of goods and services is not increasing at same pace. This leads to imbalance between demand and supply of goods and services which leads to inflation. Therefore, to control inflation, appropriate measures should be taken to control the population.

d) Fiscal Policy;

Fiscal policy refers to Government policy of public spending and taxes. The main objective of Fiscal policy is to maintain only a slight change in the general price level. During inflation, the government tries to reduce its expenditure on unproductive activities and the direct tax rate increases so that the purchasing power of the population is reduced. Due to reduction in the purchasing power of the population, demand of goods and services will be reduced leading to controlled Inflation.

e) Direct Measures;

There are several other options available to the government to control inflation and wage and price freeze, rationing of goods, establishments of public service shops, price review / stabilization committees. These several measures are often used by Governments to control inflation.

Kapil Dev Aggarwal

fees for orders of J Rajive Bhalla, High Court, Chandigarh filed march 14th, 2011

My Complaint against high Court Judge;
On 31^st of May we all read in The tribune an incident wherein a litigant got in court room of Rajive Bhalla, Judge, High Court, Chandigarh and made a complaint/ statement regarding graft / corruption. The gentleman was client of Mr Sisodia a known lawyer of fair standing at the bar. The Litigant said in open Court that he had paid 34 lacs to his lawyer for onward payment to Rajive Bhalla, Judge, High Court for favorable order. This was 3rd known incident in Court room of Rajive Bhalla, Judge, High Court.  http://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20120531/punjab.htm#19

There was another incident in early 2011, wherein another litigant had got up in court room of Rajive Bhalla, Judge, High Court and made a complaint / statement about graft / corruption. He also said that He had paid lacs of Rupees to his lawyer for onward payment to judge for favorable order and if amount was less he can pay more. The gentleman was client of Mr Ahluwalia a known lawyer of fair standing at the bar.

The incident published in “The Tribune” on 31^st may was in fact 3^rd known incident involving Rajive Bhalla, Judge, High Court. 2nd incident is reproduced below by way of the text of Judicial record involving Rajive Bhalla, Judge, High Court where he was asked to recuse himself from a matter and he was told not to accept briefs in his chambers. Any one can obtain certified copy of Company Application 167 of 2011 decided on 1.4.2011 text of which is as under;-

"IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Company Misc Application 167 of 2011 in IOIN in CP 96 of 1997

Altos India Ltd                     Petitioner

Versus              

Dadan Bhai & Ors                Respondent

Application for placing on record written submissions On issues raised on 11.3.2011 and motion for recusal.

Respectfully showeth;

1.     The court raised certain issues on 11.3.2011 with respect to letters written to and about Sh D P Ojha. Written submissions are enclosed.

2.     Prayer is also made that this court recuse itself from hearing the above matter for the reasons stated in Written submissions.

It is therefore prayed that Written submissions about issues raised by the court be perused / taken on record (If they have any relevance to the case) and for the reasons stated therein the Court of Mr Justice Rajiv Bhalla recuse itself from hearing the matter.

Chandigarh                K D Aggarwal

Date; March 14, 2011  Applicant

"IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Company Misc Application 167 of 2011 In IOIN in CP 96 of 1997

Altos India Ltd                           Petitioner

Versus              

Dadan Bhai & Ors                      Respondent

WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON ISSUES RAISED BY COURT ON 11-3-2011

Respectfully Showeth:-

1.     On 11-3-2011 when the matter came up, the court wanted to know the reply of applicant about;

A)     Complaints to Sh D P Ojha regarding illegal payment of about Rs 1.00 crores being made by him to Industrial security against % gratification to him.

B)     Complaint of corruption against D P Ojha to Regional Director, Ministry of Corporate affairs regarding payment to Industrial Security.

C)     RTI applications.

The court observed that copies of all above documents in bunch are with court.

2.     The court was of the opinion that all the above letters are because of impugned order and applicant should not have written any letters against D P Ojha, an employee of Ministry of Corporate affairs New Delhi who is presently OL but should have approached the Judge in Chambers. The court also observed that applicant appears to be starved and in fact a complaint should be made against him to Bar Council.

3.     Nothing can be more further from the truth. A perusal of the record will show the first letter against illegal payment to Industrial security being made by D P Ojha against the express orders of the Court was by my letter Dt 20-11-2010 three months before the impugned order. The said complaint also mentioned that % commission is being charged By D P Ojha in name of Regional Director and secretary of MCA. OL has stated that my letter Dt 20-11-2010 delivered to him on 20-11-2010 was because of impugned order Dt 3-2-2011 passed after three months belies common sense. How my letter of 20-11-2010 can be based on something which happened on after three months on 3/12-2-2011. Above letter was followed by letter Dt 7-1-2011 again one month before impugned order Dt 3-2-2011 received on 12-2-2011.

4.     Same is the contention in response to observations at ‘B’, since my letter to Ministry of Corporate Affairs is verbatim copies of my letters Dt 20-11-2010 / 7-1-2011. Only additional para is w.r.t. to Altos India Ltd.

5.     It is the belief of applicant that if the executive officer is honestly doing its job and its orders suffers from errors of law than judicial review is the ONLY proper remedy, However it is also true that if executive orders are not bona fide and actuated by a b c d, then judicial review alone is not sufficient but matter should also be brought to the notice of appropriate authorities. That is why there is hierarchy and vigilance sections in each department of executive.  Sh Vishal Aggarwal advocate personally hand delivered letter DT 22-12-2010 on 22-12-2010 pointing out that Order Dt 1-9-2005 is ten times more powerful via concurrence than two lines in Form 58. However the contentions in said letter are maliciously silent in the impugned order. The demand was made and rightly informed to higher authorities.

6.     It has repeatedly been told to Mr Tewari, CPIO, O/O OL Ministry of Corporate affairs, New Delhi that if DP ojha is stealing from the properties and assets of companies in liquidation than he may decline to give me any information, however if they have nothing to hide and doing their jobs honestly they can simply put the asked files for inspection and give copies thereof. Mr Tewari has told me that Sh D P Ojha has forbade them to give me any information under RTI unsaid on the ground that information is prejudicial to the personal interests of D P Ojha. There are instructions from the employer of Sh D P Ojha to give all information sought under RTI, hence his denial of information has been brought to the notice of his employer.

7.     An employee of the liquidation section has been seeking use of Mercedes Benz car of the applicant for travel to out of station which has always been declined. He was always told that if some mishap occurs even a small repair costs a few lacs. If applicant informs this to company judge, he is complaining, if he does not; then why not before a false office note was put up. Seeking information on whether any office note was put up by staff on administrative side in case of Altos India Ltd is to know what facts have been told and what not. If they are honest what prevents them to show me my concerned file. That is why we exchange pleadings in law.

8.     The matters raised by the court are not the result of impugned order as they predate the impugned order. The matters are between Sh D P Ojha and his employer the Ministry of corporate affairs, New Delhi. Mr D P Ojha is very resourceful and highly connected person and will obtain appropriate orders from his Ministry also. He does not need a chaperon.

9.     I have been given unsolicited advice that I should file suit for recovery against Industrial security which has filed an affidavit refusing to accept terms and conditions of their empanelment with High Court. Once their affidavit was brought on record on administrative side by OL, may be for another reasons, Judicial course would have been to depanel them. Industrial security is very rich company based on its ‘connections’ and have sufficient resources and can hire most competent advocates who are ‘officially advocates’.

10.    The court also observed that applicant appears to be starved and in fact a complaint should be made against him to Bar Council. I refuse to dignify the abuses by responding t them. The settled fee should have been paid without having to ask for it. Regarding Complaint to Bar council, applicant has never certified anything under Chartered Accountants Act or practiced as such. There are people who have been on the CAs panel of OL and also appeared on this side as advocates wearing robes, but no threats were given to them. But then for Justice Rajive Bhalla rules are different for me a common man.

11.    The reply is being filed to put the record straight as lies have been told to Sh Rajiv Bhalla in chambers by vested interests. Mr Justice Rajiv Bhalla has made uncalled for comments, has used intemperate/ abusive language / gave verbal threats against applicant and has shown extreme bias and prejudice against the applicant and in favor of respondent D P Ojha based on lies told to him in Chambers by Sh D P Ojha and has asked me to appear before him on 16-3-2011. People are not exhibits. There are no Exhibits.

In the circumstances, neither me nor my counsel can appear on 16-3-2011 to prevent repeat of happenings in IFCI Vs AVI Autos. The Court of Sh Rajiv Bhalla is requested to recuse itself from the case.

KD Aggarwal, Advocate

Applicant."

Kapil Dev Aggarwal

For the oath of Office of Justice Rajive Bhalla please click here 

Oath taken by Justice Rajive Bhalla.