misuse of public peons for personal use a case of corruption.

To,                      Date; 30^th January 2015

Registrar General,

High Court of Punjab and Haryana,

Chandigarh.

Sub;  Prohibition of using Government peons for private work.

Sir,

1.     It has come to my notice that there is rampant misuse of government peons for private work by Judges at all levels leading to scandalizing the administration of Courts and lowering its dignity amounting to Criminal Contempt of Court.

2.     The judges are using government peons at their official residences. Since this is done by senior judges hence lower level judges also follow this practice sincerely. To enable government peons to work at home, official records are manipulated. And for such small favor the judges subvert their independence to those peons. In this way the vicious cycle of corruption continues ending up at last level of the hierarchy.

3.     Home Peon permissible under Rule 7 would not include Private cook, Private gardener, Private Servant, Private sweeper, Private utencil cleaner, private washer man, Private toilet cleaner etc. Home peon would mean peon to look after government files at homes of judges.

4.     The instructions issued by the government of Punjab NO 3420-SII(3)-73 Dt 12.7.1973 are very clear on the subject. These instructions be circulated to all Judges to enhance dignity and respect of Judiciary. The circulation be carried with a rider that taking private work from government peons would amount to violation of law by judges, scandalizing the administration of Courts and lowering its dignity amounting to Criminal Contempt of Court.

5.     Lastly Judges also use official vehicles for personal work e.g. for sending their wards to schools, visiting home, friends, relatives, kitties parties and the like. Such a conduct be treated as corruption and offense involving moral turpitude.  

KD Aggarwal

J Suryakant of High Court habitually obstructing administration of Justice.

To                      November 1, 2014

                Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice,

                Punjab & Haryana High Court,

                Chandigarh.

Sub:           Application for initiation of suo motu contempt proceedings/ disciplinary action against Judge Surya Kant for obstructing litigants, lawyers, staff, Court officials etc by routinely coming late by 30-50 minutes to Court thereby holding up of court work.

Sir,

It’s a daily routine of Judge Surya Kant Sharma to come late for court work by 30-50 minutes. Whereas in Chandigarh every other of 70 judges start work by 10.00 AM, J Surya Kant is habitually late by 40 mins both in  pre lunch session and post lunch session and then gets up even before others. Late coming by any Judge causes obstruction in administration of Justice as it hinders; Litigants, lawyers, staff, Court officials etc. Copy of a reference where a Judge convicted himself under contempt of court’s act for coming late for work is enclosed.

2 (c) criminal contempt" means the publication (whether by words. spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representations, or otherwise) of any matter or the doing of any other act whatsoever which-

(i) scandalises or tends to scandalise, or lowers or tends to lower the authority of, any court; or

(ii) prejudices, or interferes or tends to interfere with, the due course of any judicial proceeding; or

(iii) interferes or tends to interfere with, or obstructs or tends to obstruct, the administration of justice in any other manner;

        Section 16. Contempt by judge, magistrate or other person acting judicially -

(1) Subject to the provisions of any law for the time being in force, a judge, magistrate or other persons acting judicially shall also be liable for contempt of his own court or of any other court in the same manner as any other individual is liable and the provisions of this Act, so far as may be, apply accordingly.

Section 19 of IPC;-

“Judge".--The word "Judge" denotes not only every person who is officially designated as a Judge, but also … “

 Section 3(2) of Judges Protection Act;-

“(2) Nothing in sub-section (1) shall debar or affect in any manner the power of the Central Government or the State Government or the Supreme Court of India or any High Court or any other authority under any law for the time being in force to take such action (whether by way of civil, criminal or departmental proceedings or otherwise) against any person who is or was a Judge.”

It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may implement law by suo moto invoking Criminal contempt proceedings against Judge Surya Kant u/s   Sec. 2(c) r/w section 16 of Contempt’s of court Act for daily obstruction of Justice or take disciplinary proceedings for daily coming late thereby obstructing litigants, lawyers, staff, Court officials etc.

Nemo est supra legis. No one is above law.

                                K D Aggarwal

Appeal to converts / Muslims

An open appeal to our Hindu converts and worldwide Muslims majority.

We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is the religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the specter of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.

The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march.. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Hindus, Christian or others. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.

The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,' is cowed and extraneous.

Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China's huge population was peaceful as well, but  Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people.

History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points:

Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence.

Peace-loving Muslims will become everyone’  enemy if they don't speak up, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.

Kapil Dev Aggarwal