Saturday, October 1, 2011
Exclude Post dated cheques from cheque bounce case u/s 138 NI Act.
The
Hon’ble Chief Justice of Punjab & Haryana High Court,
Chandigarh.
Secretary
legal/legislative affairs, Punjab.
Suggestions for
PREVENTING back log IN LOWER JUDICIARY
Prevention is better than cure. Reduce points of Dispute
Cases under Section 138 NI Act.
Most of
the cases are under this section. Every legal document including bears a column
for date, place & Signature. Column for Date is meant for the mentioning
the date when the document is signed. Similarly the column of date mentioned in
Cheque means the date when cheque is signed. It cannot be treated as anything
else. For a cheque to be valid wef from a future date there should be two
columns for date. One when cheque is drawn / signed, 2nd when cheque
will be valid. A bill of exchange mentions two dates, one when the bill of
exchange is drawn and 2nd when the bill of exchange is to be paid.
In existing cheques, there is only one column for date meant for the date when
cheque is drawn and signed. A judge which misinterpreted a post dated cheque
having one date column clearly misinterpreted it as bill of exchange and gave
legality to a void document.
A large number of disputes relates to a few acts only which can be
curtailed by either amendments of Acts or by enforcement of Acts. In my letter
of 1st January 2010, I had taken up disputes under
i) Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act/
ii) Rent Act
iii) Power of Attorney Act
Proviso to Section 138 also clearly mentions complaint has to be filed
“within a period of six months from the
date on which it is drawn”. The literal meaning of ‘drawn’ is the date when
cheque is written and signed. One cannot draw, sign, & submit a document in
court on 5.10.2009 and put date as 1.12.2009. Such a document will be void on
the face of it. There is no provision of post dated document in law and in
particular NI Act. The present problem which has been created by a judge has to
be removed by another Judge.
Cases under Rent Act.;
Cases
of personal necessity should be decided on the basis of sworn declaration that
the landlord will neither sell the property nor let it out for a period of ten
years next. If a landlord violates his declaration, following options can be
taken:-
A)
Tenant to be put back in possession.
B)
Tenant to be granted compensation on the rent being paid by him.
(Such
compensation to be a statutory charge on the property of landlord. Court should
send copy of the declaration to Patwari for marking red entry in Jamabandi,/ to
Estate officer for recording state lien/charge for enforcement of declaration.)
C) Landlord to be
convicted for perjury for minimum period of seven years.
D) Any transfer of
such property during the continuation of declaration to be declared void.
Note:
The Act will require amendment.
Power of attorneys Act; Another major disputes relates to sale of
properties on the basis of Power of Attorneys, their misuse etc. Such
transactions also causes major loss of revenue to State. Donee should be
restricted to 1st degree blood relation to be used only in case of
physical disability/ distance or any other personal difficulty etc.
Note:
This will require amendment of Power of attorney Act and strict enforcement of
Registration Act.
Dated
01.01.2010
KD Aggarwal
On October 11, 2011, Supreme Court held;
“A power
of attorney is not an instrument of transfer in regard to any
right, title or interest
in an immovable property.
The power of attorney is creation of
an agency whereby the grantor authorizes the grantee to do the acts
specified therein, on behalf
of grantor, which when
executed will be binding on the grantor as if done by
him (see section 1A and section 2 of the Powers of
Attorney Act, 1882). It
is revocable or terminable
at any time unless it is made irrevocable in a manner
known to law. Even an irrevocable attorney does not have the effect of
transferring title to the grantee.”
Thursday, September 1, 2011
Part-IV
Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal
father of Kapil Dev Aggarwal;
A. Early life and education;
Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal is
6th child and eldest son of Mrs. Lajwanti Aggarwal and Lala Mela Ram
Aggarwal. Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal was born on 18th April, 1924 at
family home at B-8, Mochpura Road, (Mochpura bazaar) Ludhiana. He was educated from Arya School
Ludhiana until 5th standard. Later the family moved to Lahore in
1935. In Lahore the family took on rent a villa measuring 80,000 sq feet; 6, Muzang Road, Labore. The Villa was taken at then monthly
rental of Rs 250/- in the year 1935. Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal completed his school
education in year 1940 i.e. 10th standard from DAV School, Lahore. He did F.A. (1942)
and B.A. (1944) from DAV College Lahore in Political Science and Economics. Mr.
Raj Kumar Aggarwal completed his law from Law College Lahore in the year 1947. After partition of the Country, he started his practice in the year 1947 in the High Court of
Punjab (post partition east Punjab) which at that time started functioning from
Peteroff at Shimla.
Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal married Sushila Devi daughter of Mrs. Budhan Devi and Mr. Girdhari Lal Banker S/O Mr. Ram Rattan Banker S/O Lala Rura Mal Banker. He was married on September 1, 1954 at Ludhiana. The reception was held two days later at Hotel Cecil, Shimla. He has two children daughter Renu born on September 6th 1955 and son Kapil Dev Aggarwal born September 29th, 1967. Daughter Renu is married to Mr. Nalin Kumar S/O Mr. L C Gupta and Mrs. on 18th June 1983. They have one son Ravi Gupta born on 16th April 1984 at Chandigarh. Sushila Devi died peacefully in her sleep on September 5th 2005.
C. Professional life;
Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal
began his professional life in the year 1947 as pleader (as per rules in that
period a person was required to act as pleader for two years before they were
permitted to argue cases in High Court). Below is the picture of 1st office (1948) of Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal as seen today.
![]() |
Hydeville, Annadale Road Shimla. |
He joined as pleader with Mr.
Thakur Dass advocate, (Thakur Dass F/O Ishwar Dass, Chabil Dass & Shiela) who
was practicing in lower courts. After two years he joined Mr. D K Mahajan
advocate as his junior and worked with him till the elevation of Mr. D K
Mahajan as Judge of High Court in 1957. Thereafter Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal
joined Mr. P C Pandit advocate, as his junior and worked with him as such till
the elevation of Mr. P C Pandit as Judge of High Court on 4th March
1960. Mr. Raj Kumar then joined Mr. B R Tuli, Advocate till Mr. B R Tuli was
elevated as Judge of High Court on 28th May 1968.
Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal in his
independent practice became advisor to New Bank of India Ltd, then a private
Bank in 1964 and remained as its retainer till New Bank of India was merged in
Punjab National Bank in 1993. He also became retainer to central Bank of India
in 1968 and remained as its retainer till Central Bank of India employed its
full time law officers in 1982. He is dealt with education matters and worked
for Punjab University since 1964; He was proficient in real estate matters worked
for Improvement Trust Ludhiana since 1970 apart from several private land
related disputes from villages in and around Ludhiana.
Most of his class fellows
choose to become Judges of High Court. To name a few Surinder Singh, RN Mittal,
SC Mittal, RN Aggarwal, MS Gujral and Jagmohan Tandon, other class fellows were
Amar Chand, F/O Kapil Sood, Mast Ram Gupta, F/O Deepak Gupta, Kailash Sood F/O
Ajay Kumar Sood. Ram Nath Vaid F/O Manmohan Vaid and Vipin Vaid.
Chief Justice D K Mahajan
and later Chief Justice R S Narula wanted Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal to also become
Judge of High Court. Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal declined by saying; “Why you want
to retire me 20 years earlier. Pension won’t be sufficient for me to maintain
my family including my extended family/ relatives who are dependent upon me.”
D. Family;
Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal had
six sisters and 2 brothers. The names of the sisters are Prakash, Shakuntla,
Lakshmi, Raj Kumari, Padma and Satya. The names of his brothers are Rajinder
Aggarwal and Rajeshwar Aggarwal.
He had five
brother-in-laws. Mr. Harprakash, Mr. Vedprakash, Mr. Ramprakash, Mr. Gopal
Krishan Banker and Mr. Kewal Krishan Banker. He had two sisters-in-law namely Mrs.
Lajwanti Garg and Mrs. Santosh.
Having such a huge family kept him mostly busy in looking after not so fortunate ones in the family.
i) Most of his life was spent in settling the children of one of his sister-in-law (wife’s sister) who left her husband and was living independently with her five children.
a) Her eldest daughter was in government service, where transfer
and postings are most important factors and determine your future life. Most of
the time Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal was kept busy in her transfer and postings. All
her connections are because of plum postings, she got through the help of Raj
Kumar Aggarwal.
B) Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal helped her 2nd daughter in getting;-
I) A teaching job,
II) Admission in University hostel without being a student under
discretionary quota of chancellor.
III) Going to Delhi for her admission in a
Training institute.
IV) Appearing as a witness in court cases to enable them get money
from their estranged father.
(This daughter got
dentures and assisted in cataract operation of Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal).
C) Her eldest son could not afford to live independently after he got a government job. So he was given food, accommodation by Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal at his home.
D) Youngest son got admission in NDA but in view of treatment he was getting in NDA, he wanted to quit. Had he been allowed to quit, he would have no future, so much time was spent in locating a friend of his CO. and his CO was requested to go lenient on this boy so that he should not quit Air Force. But for this help, this boy would never have been in Air Force.
E) Another son had done his LLB and wanted to join Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal in his profession. But Mrs. Sushila Devi declined as her husband had spent practically all his life in settling her relative’s children and had no time for his own children. However Renu Gupta and Kapil Dev Aggarwal are self made and never needed crutches in their life unlike those mentioned above and never used their father’s name or conections any time in their life.
ii) After death of his mother–in-law Mrs. Budhen Devi a dispute
arose between her sons over property distribution. Gopal filed a suit for
partition. this was dismissed. Then Mr Raj Kumar Aggarwal was engaged to file time barred appeal. Appeal was allowed in favor of of Gopal. Local commissioner was appointed for partition of property who gave a report that property cannot be partitioned and property be sold and money divided between claimants. Property was sold by court at rock bottom prices. Mr. Raj Kumar was again asked for help. he again filed another appeal and sale was set aside and property restored to its original owners. In between Kewal a Brother-in-law (wife's brother) stabbed the purchaser who was connected to local MLA and criminal cases was foisted upon Kewal. Again help of Mr raj Kumar was sought in criminal cases. Mr Raj Kumar Aggarwal 1st got kewal bailed out and than also got the criminal cases quashed otherwise Kewal might have been imprisoned for a long time.
iii) He got Job for one of his nephew (sister's son) in a private Bank which Bank was later nationalized. He also provided him with other necessities and luxuries of life. The said nephew remained in the job till his retirement.
iv) He offered another of his nephews’ (sister's son) full financial, moral and material support to enable him to become an Engineer and shifted him from Ludhiana to Chandigarh to enable him to fulfill his dream. He became Engineer on the strength of offer of support by Mr. Raj Kumar Aggarwal.
v) He got husband of one his niece out of a difficult situation, when the said relative got in ‘extreme disfavor’ of a minister over the relative’s refusal to oblige the Minister.
vi) he got job for son-in-law of his sister in a Bank.
In view of
responsibilities of relative’s, Mr Raj Kumar Aggarwal could buy his own
property only in year 1988 out of his provident fund, where he thereafter lived contentedly along with his family.
Later years
He was never lied in his life and was always
ready to help others or those in distress. He lived an honest and contended
life and used to daily walk for 4-5 Kilometers till the age of 90 years. On
31st March 2014 he suffered fracture of right neck femur of hip joint for which
he was operated on 1st April 2014 at PGI Chandigarh by Dr Raj
Bahadur and got hip implant. On January 20th 2015, he suffered
fracture of left neck femur of hip joint for which he was operated on 21st
January at GMCH Sector 32 Chandigarh by Dr Sudhir Garg. In May 201, he lost
appetite. He could not eat or walk. He remained admitted to Hospital GMCH 32. He died peacefully in his sleep at the age of 92 years 4 months on 18th
August, 2016. He led a good, contended and fruitful life from 18th April 1924
to 18th August, 2016. He leaves behind his daughter Renu Gupta and Son Kapil
Dev Aggarwal.
Kapil Dev Aggarwal
Monday, August 1, 2011
What is the effect of increase of interest rates in developing economy on cost push inflation?
THE FREEMEN
In
response to my appeal Dated August 5, 2010, the Executive Director vide his
reply Dated September 27th, 2010 stated that there is no way to know
the effect of increase in interest rates on inflation, increase in
unemployment, poverty, closure of industries, foreclosure of mortgages and
general effect. http://kapildevaggarwal.blogspot.com/2010_11_01_archive.html
This is palpably incorrect. The effect of increase in interest rates on inflation, increase in unemployment, poverty, closure of industries, foreclosure of mortgages and general effect is easily known. Following is the response which I sent to him;
This is palpably incorrect. The effect of increase in interest rates on inflation, increase in unemployment, poverty, closure of industries, foreclosure of mortgages and general effect is easily known. Following is the response which I sent to him;
To, Dt
January 20th 2011
Sh
C Krishnan, Executive Director,
Reserve
bank of India, Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg,
Fort,
Mumbai – 400001.
Sub;
Your letter / order Dt 27.9.2010
Ref;
My letter /appeal Dt August 5 2010
Dear
Sir,
A. Demand pull inflation can be controlled by
increase in lending rates but cost push inflation can only be controlled by
reducing lending rates.
1. Vide my letter / appeal Dt 5.8.2010 I has asked the following
query under RTI;-
“After RBI decides to increase rates;-
1) How many company / business declare
bankruptcies?
2) How many accounts are declared NPAs
3) How many people loose employment?
4) How many mortgages are foreclosed?”
2. Vide your order Dt 27.9.2010 you were
pleased to pass the following order;-
“4. …. It’s needed to be mentioned here that the queries made by
the appellant are not capable of eliciting any definite information from the
Reserve bank or for that matter, any public authority….”
3. Should the matter simply end there or
is it our duty of to measure the effect of monetary policy on public at large.
Is the information too difficult to collect?
a) Banks collect monthly NPA figures and
send them to RBI. The format can include bankruptcies. NPA figures are directly
proportionate to repo rates.
b) Banks have KYC Norms whereby they
should also get monthly employment figures of their loanees or can get them
along with monthly stock statements.
c) Banks already submit monthly statements
where they have foreclosed mortgages under securitization Act.
d) Government is already giving monthly
IIP (Index of Industrial production) which sees a dip whenever there is
increase in repo rates.IIP figures are inversely
proportionate to repo rates.
When
I asked my query under RTI, I already knew the answer. Object was that RBI
should start tabulating / collecting data which is the most important input
required for laying down monetary policy. You may argue that closure of
factories of business may be for lot other reasons than merely high cost of
debt. However a careful analysis of the above data will give a reasonable
accurate data about the businesses which are closed / increase in NPAs /
increase in unemployment solely because of increase in repo rates.
4. In my August 5 2010 letter, I had
mentioned in ‘PS’ Para 5 that current monetary policy of RBI will lead to hyper
inflation in economy. After 5 months results are before you. The simplified
version of my contention in Para 5 is as below;-
Causes of Inflation;
Inflation
is dependent on constraint in supply.
Lesser
the supply- higher the inflation.
Supply
is further dependent on cost of supply.
Higher
the cost of debt - higher the cost of supply
higher
the cost of supply - leads to reduction in supply/
Successive
increase in cost of debt since march 2010 has led to present situation.
Suggestions;-
Reduce
the cost of debt (lending rates) ie Repo Rate by at least 1.5% immediately.
RBI
should buy back bonds in open market operation to increase liquidity which has
seen a dip.
I hope
you will take my suggestions in the right perspective.
Yours
truly in service of nation
Sd/-
CA K
D Aggarwal
Copy to
; Sh Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister of India, 7 Race Course Road, New Delhi for
information and necessary action.
Friday, July 1, 2011
Judge Jokes I
Judge Joke 1
The cross eyed judge looked at the three defendants in the dock and said to the first one, “So how do you plead?” “Not guilty” said the second defendant. “I wasn’t talking to you” the judge replied. “I never said a word” the third defendant replied.
The cross eyed judge looked at the three defendants in the dock and said to the first one, “So how do you plead?” “Not guilty” said the second defendant. “I wasn’t talking to you” the judge replied. “I never said a word” the third defendant replied.
Judge
Joke 2
The defendant stood up in the dock and said to the judge, “I don’t recognize this court!” “Why?” asked the Judge. “Because you’ve had it decorated since the last time I was here.”
The defendant stood up in the dock and said to the judge, “I don’t recognize this court!” “Why?” asked the Judge. “Because you’ve had it decorated since the last time I was here.”
Judge
Joke 3
Taking his seat in his chambers, the judge faced the opposing lawyers. “So,” he said, “I have been presented, by both of you, with a bribe.” Both lawyers squirmed uncomfortably. “You, attorney Leon, gave me $15,000. And you, attorney Campos, gave me $10,000.” The judge reached into his pocket and pulled out a check. He handed it to Leon … “Now then, I am returning $5,000, and we are going to decide this case solely on its merits.”
Taking his seat in his chambers, the judge faced the opposing lawyers. “So,” he said, “I have been presented, by both of you, with a bribe.” Both lawyers squirmed uncomfortably. “You, attorney Leon, gave me $15,000. And you, attorney Campos, gave me $10,000.” The judge reached into his pocket and pulled out a check. He handed it to Leon … “Now then, I am returning $5,000, and we are going to decide this case solely on its merits.”
Judge
Joke 4
A red-faced judge convened court after a long lunch. The first case involved a man charged with drunk driving who claimed it simply wasn’t true. “I m as sober as you are, your honor,” the man claimed. The judge replied, “Clerk, please enter a guilty plea. The defendant is sentenced to 30 days.”
A red-faced judge convened court after a long lunch. The first case involved a man charged with drunk driving who claimed it simply wasn’t true. “I m as sober as you are, your honor,” the man claimed. The judge replied, “Clerk, please enter a guilty plea. The defendant is sentenced to 30 days.”
Judge
Joke 5
The Judge admonished the witness, “Do you understand that you have sworn to tell the truth?” “I do.” “Do you understand what will happen if you are not truthful?” “Sure,” said the witness. “My side will win.”
The Judge admonished the witness, “Do you understand that you have sworn to tell the truth?” “I do.” “Do you understand what will happen if you are not truthful?” “Sure,” said the witness. “My side will win.”
Judge
Joke 6
The Judge asked the defendant, “Mr. Jones ,do you understand that you have sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?” “I do.” “Now what do you say to defend yourself?” “Your Honor, under those limitations… nothing.”
The Judge asked the defendant, “Mr. Jones ,do you understand that you have sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?” “I do.” “Now what do you say to defend yourself?” “Your Honor, under those limitations… nothing.”
Judge
Joke 7
The judge said to his dentist: “Pull my tooth, the whole tooth and nothing but the tooth.”
The judge said to his dentist: “Pull my tooth, the whole tooth and nothing but the tooth.”
Judge
Joke 8
Judge: “Is it true that you owe your neighbor a thousand dollars?” Defendant: “Yes, it’s true.” Judge: “Then, why don’t you just pay him back?” Defendant: “Because it wouldn’t be true anymore.”
Judge: “Is it true that you owe your neighbor a thousand dollars?” Defendant: “Yes, it’s true.” Judge: “Then, why don’t you just pay him back?” Defendant: “Because it wouldn’t be true anymore.”
Judge
Joke 9
A drunk is in front of a judge. The judge
says, 'You've been brought here for drinking.' The drunk says, 'Okay, let's get
started.'
Judge
Joke 10
A young woman was appearing in court to face a public disorder charge. The charges were read out, and she was asked how she pleaded. “Not guilty,” the woman answered emphatically. The prosecution council then approached the woman and said: “Is it true that on the 11th of December, last year, you committed an act of gross indecency with a one-legged dwarf – who was waving a union jack – on the roof of a car, whilst travelling at over 100 mph through the center of London, in a blizzard?” The woman composed herself, looked straight at the prosecution council and calmly said: “What was the date again?”
A young woman was appearing in court to face a public disorder charge. The charges were read out, and she was asked how she pleaded. “Not guilty,” the woman answered emphatically. The prosecution council then approached the woman and said: “Is it true that on the 11th of December, last year, you committed an act of gross indecency with a one-legged dwarf – who was waving a union jack – on the roof of a car, whilst travelling at over 100 mph through the center of London, in a blizzard?” The woman composed herself, looked straight at the prosecution council and calmly said: “What was the date again?”
Judge
Joke 11
A prosecuting attorney called his first witness, a grandmotherly, elderly woman, to the stand. He approached her and asked, “Mrs. Jones, do you know me?” She responded, “Why, yes, I do know you Mr. Williams. I’ve known you since you were a young boy. And frankly, you’ve been a big disappointment to me. You lie, you cheat on your wife, you manipulate people and talk about them behind their backs. You think you re a rising big shot when you haven’t the brains to realize you never will amount to anything more than a two-bit paper pusher. Yes, I know you.”
A prosecuting attorney called his first witness, a grandmotherly, elderly woman, to the stand. He approached her and asked, “Mrs. Jones, do you know me?” She responded, “Why, yes, I do know you Mr. Williams. I’ve known you since you were a young boy. And frankly, you’ve been a big disappointment to me. You lie, you cheat on your wife, you manipulate people and talk about them behind their backs. You think you re a rising big shot when you haven’t the brains to realize you never will amount to anything more than a two-bit paper pusher. Yes, I know you.”
The lawyer was stunned.
Not knowing what else to do he pointed across the room and asked, “Mrs.
Williams, do you know the defense attorney?”
She again replied, “Why,
yes I do. I’ve known Mr. Bradley since he was a youngster, too. I used to
baby-sit him for his parents. And he, too, has been a real disappointment to
me. He’s lazy, bigoted, he has a drinking problem. The man can’t build a normal
relationship with anyone and his law practice is one of the shoddiest in the
entire state. Yes, I know him.”
At this point, the judge
rapped the courtroom to silence and called both counselors to the bench. In a
very quiet voice, he said with menace, “If either of you asks her if she knows
me, you ll be jailed for contempt!”
Judge
Joke 12
Prosecutor: Did you kill the victim? Defendant: No, I did not. Prosecutor: Do you know what the penalties are for perjury? Defendant: Yes, I do. And they are a hell of a lot better than the penalty for murder.
Prosecutor: Did you kill the victim? Defendant: No, I did not. Prosecutor: Do you know what the penalties are for perjury? Defendant: Yes, I do. And they are a hell of a lot better than the penalty for murder.
Judge
Joke 13
Judge: All your responses to the questions must be oral. Do you understand? A: Yes Judge: What school did you attend in the fall of 1995? A: Oral.
Judge: All your responses to the questions must be oral. Do you understand? A: Yes Judge: What school did you attend in the fall of 1995? A: Oral.
Judge
Joke 14
Judge: Are you married? A. No, I m divorced. Judge. And what did your husband do before you divorced him? A. A lot of things I didn’t know about.
Judge: Are you married? A. No, I m divorced. Judge. And what did your husband do before you divorced him? A. A lot of things I didn’t know about.
Judge
Joke 15
Judge: Your first marriage was terminated by death? A: Yes, by death. Judge: And by whose death was it terminated?
Judge: Your first marriage was terminated by death? A: Yes, by death. Judge: And by whose death was it terminated?
Judge
Joke 16
Judge: You stated that the stairs went down to the basement, is that correct? A: Yes. Judge: And these same stairs, did the also go up?
Judge: You stated that the stairs went down to the basement, is that correct? A: Yes. Judge: And these same stairs, did the also go up?
Judge
Joke 17
Judge: What is your relationship with the plaintiff? A: She is my daughter. Judge: Was she your daughter on February 13, 1979?
Judge: What is your relationship with the plaintiff? A: She is my daughter. Judge: Was she your daughter on February 13, 1979?
Judge
Joke 18
Judge: Doctor, how many autopsies have you performed on dead people?
Judge: Doctor, how many autopsies have you performed on dead people?
Ans: All my autopsies are
on dead people.
Judge
Joke 19
Jury: Twelve men and women trying to decide which party has the best lawyer. Justice: A decision in your favor.
Jury: Twelve men and women trying to decide which party has the best lawyer. Justice: A decision in your favor.
Judge
Joke 20
Prove : 2 / 10 = 2
Art student : Out of syllabus
Engineering student : Wrong Question
Medical student : Not possible.
CA. We have to audit to find out.
Judge I will prove it.
TWO / TEN = WO / EN
(W=23rd letter, O=15th letter, E=5th letter & N=14th
letter)
=23+15 / 5+14
=38 / 19
=2
Art student : Out of syllabus
Engineering student : Wrong Question
Medical student : Not possible.
CA. We have to audit to find out.
Judge I will prove it.
TWO / TEN = WO / EN
(W=23rd letter, O=15th letter, E=5th letter & N=14th
letter)
=23+15 / 5+14
=38 / 19
=2
Judges only ask the right person Whatever you will want, you will get.
Kaps.
.
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)