traffic analytics

Justice is where Judges follow Law-KD Aggarwal. Powered by Blogger.

If Judgments were based on law, every lawyer will get same fees!-KD Aggarwal

Facts and Statute are Not Relevant. They are invented / concealed / amended by corrupt Judges - KD Aggarwal.

Let us make India Corruption free

The matter and inference drawn are based on actual personal experiences of Author. They are meant to serve as beacon to those who may find themselves in similar situations to save themselves from clutches of unscrupulous persons. They are also meant to serve as an eye opener to those men who are sitting at Helm of Affairs for improvement of judicial system and corruption free India, so that never again one says; "the law court is not a cathedral (what they used to be) but a casino where so much depends on the throw of the dice (and money). K R Narayanan http://www.krnarayanan.in/html/speeches/others/jan28_00.htm

Transparency improves Accountability

Every Judge is Public Servant and thus accountable for his acts. Transparency of Complaints against Judges and instant stringent action for perjury and violation of their oath will improve Dignity of Courts and Justice delivery.

Saturday, February 14, 2015

Theft of Assets by DP Ojha official liquidator Delhi and ML Sharma.

As per the norms of Official Liquidator, he has to make inventory of assets the moment he takes possession he has to make inventory of assets which is countersigned by security agency also. However D P Ojha, official Liquidator presently New Delhi has never made any inventory of assets on day of possession. He prepares the inventory after he has stolen the most of the steal-able assets.  Even then he does not stop stealing even after Inventory is prepared, he would again steal the assets and then himself lodge the FIR. Non preparation of inventory at the time of possession, Non verification of assets after two months. Non disposal of assets within four months are evidence of theft by D P Ojha OL Delhi. Following are few such cases by way of evidence of theft committed by D P Ojha OL Delhi.
 
It says in end ”No assets are lying in the Premises”  The company had assets worth Rs 4.00 crores and they have all been stolen by D P Ojha OL Delhi and he says there are five hundred companies under him. so the extent of theft and loss to public property is Rs 4 crores into 500 = 20,000,000,000/-






As per norms he is not required to keep the assets under his custody for more than four months as detailed hereunder;-
Order of winding Up is treated as 1st day of month
1st month (1 – 30 day)      Official Liquidator (OL) gives notice to ex-directors for filing statement of affairs offering that all expenses in terms of section 454 (4) will be paid by OL. OL also takes last balance sheet from ROC. In meantime OL takes possession of assets as per balance sheet or as available at registered office of Company and invites claims. Possession to be taken within 15 days Valuation to be filed within 15 days next. Assets can also be given on ‘Superdari’ to Banks.
2-3rd month (60 Days)       Advertisement for sale. Sale proclamation is for 60 days with reserve price. Claims be also invited simultaneously and can be settled meanwhile.
4th month  (30 days) Confirmation applied. 30 days are given for filing objections. 30 days given for objections on settlement of Claims done by CA.
By end of 4th month sale is confirmed, Sale proceeds disbursed and Companies dissolved.

Kapil Dev Aggarwal

1 comment:

  1. The decisions of the courts r not on merit.What is law it is how judges think and took the case.what he pronouns is law.If u ask this from some sufferer he will give same reply .We r helpless.

    ReplyDelete