To, date; 21.3.2016
H’ A’ Chief Justice,
Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.
Sub; Misuse of ‘part
heard’ by J Surya Kant to keep the case with himself.
Sir,
If CCTV Cameras were installed in court room of J Surya Kant, it
would reveal that J Surya Kant mentions ‘part heard’ even when case is neither
listed for arguments nor argued. ‘part heard’ is never mentioned in motion
cases. The concept of ‘part heard’ is used in regular cases only if arguments
have taken over a day and that too with consent of both counsels. This is not
the case in any motion matter. In motion hearing, if a case requires arguments
of several hours, then law requires matter to be admitted for regular hearing.
J Surya Kant habitually mentions ‘part heard’ even in motion cases
to keep the case with himself out of favor, affection or ill-will in
favor/against a lawyer or litigant. Hence whenever J Surya Kant mentions ‘part
heard’ in any case, it is evidence that he has been approached in that case.
Such a case should not be listed before him. Mention of ‘part heard’ by J Surya
Kant in any case should be treated as evidence of corruption of J Surya Kant.
In service of nation;
KD Aggarwal.
No comments:
Post a Comment