Suggestions of early resolution of citizen grievances.

To,

Sh Monahar lala Khattar,

Chief Minister of Haryana,

H No 1, Sector 3, Chandigarh.

Sub;    Suggestions of early resolution of citizen grievances.

Jai Hind,

Following steps will help citizens grievances to be resolves within few months;-

1.         Establishment of Administrative tribunal in every district of Haryana will ensure that all employees cases will be disposed off within 6 months.

2.         Establishment of Circuit Bench of High Court with strength of atleast 25 judges and provision of future strength of 75 Judges in any centrally located backward area of Haryana. Choice of backward area will ensure its development without resort to wasteful subsidy.

3.         To curb land mafia and speculation in land; a) Agreements to sell be registered. B) GPA be registered with same stamp duty as for sale deeds.

4.         Give validity to marriage vows. Muslims have no marriage disputes regarding maintenance or dowry on account of “mehar”. Hence nuptial contracts/marriage vows be given legal validity which will decide post marriage inter se disputes qua maintenance, dowry or divorce. All gifts given to either party be compulsorily written down and witnessed by both sides including one person of eminence or a lawyer.

                                                                                                In service of nation,

Date; 21.02.2015                                                                              KD Aggarwal

                                                                                                            Advocate.

My views on Media-they are truly presstitutes.

"आज कलम का कागज से मै दंगा करने वाला हूँ,""

मीडिया की सच्चाई को मै नंगा करने वाला हूँ ""

मीडिया जिसको लोकतंत्र का चौंथा खंभा होना था,""
खबरों की पावनता में जिसको गंगा होना था

आज वही दिखता है हमको वैश्या के किरदारों में,""

बिकने को तैयार खड़ा है गली चौक बाजारों में""

दाल में काला होता है तुम काली दाल दिखाते हो,""

सुरा सुंदरी उपहारों की खूब मलाई खाते हो""

गले मिले सलमान से आमिर, ये खबरों का स्तर है,""

और दिखाते इंद्राणी का कितने फिट का बिस्तर है ""

म्यॉमार में सेना के साहस का खंडन करते हो,""

और हमेशा दाउद का तुम महिमा मंडन करते हो""

हिन्दू कोई मर जाए तो घर का मसला कहते हो,""

मुसलमान की मौत को मानवता पे हमला कहते हो""

लोकतंत्र की संप्रभुता पर तुमने कैसा मारा चाटा है,""

सबसे ज्यादा तुमने हिन्दू मुसलमान को बाँटा है""

साठ साल की लूट पे भारी एक सूट दिखलाते हो,""

ओवैसी को भारत का तुम रॉबिनहुड बतलाते हो""

दिल्ली में जब पापी वहशी चीरहरण मे लगे रहे,""

तुम एश्श्वर्या की बेटी के नामकरण मे लगे रहे""

'दिल से' दुनिया समझ रही है खेल ये बेहद गंदा है,""

मीडिया हाउस और नही कुछ ब्लैकमेलिंग का धंधा है""

गूंगे की आवाज बनो अंधे की लाठी हो जाओ,""

सत्य लिखो निष्पक्ष लिखो और फिर से जिंदा हो जाओ ।

the changing form of terrorism;

"Readers of the Press can be classified into three groups: 

First, those who believe everything they read;

Second, those who no longer believe anything;

Third, those who critically examine what they read and form their judgments accordingly.

Numerically, the first group is by far the strongest, being composed of the broad masses of the people. Intellectually, it forms the simplest portion of the nation.

The second group is numerically smaller, being partly composed of those who were formerly in the first group and after a series of bitter disappointments are now prepared to believe nothing of what they see in print. 

The third group is easily the smallest, being composed of real intellectuals whom natural aptitude and education have taught to think for themselves and who in all things try to form their own judgments, while at the same time carefully sifting what they read."

Adolf Hitler; Mein kampf Chapter X

Kapil Dev

Mujhe Kya? Mera Kya?

There are two types of govt employees one for whom their service is source of power to be (mis)used. For them the criteria for any decision is;-

1             whether I have received any sefarish?

2             Whether party is known to me or known to someone close to me.

3             Whether there is involvement of any personal gratification.

If none of above three are there to satisfy govt employee than govt employee thinks

1. Mujhe Kya?
2. Mera Kya?

अगर कुछ नहीं तो assistant को बोला “dismiss कर दे”“, (assistant write all contentions).

With this attitude our country remains in the dump and nothing ever happens. That is why on 15tth August, Prime Minister of India exhorted govt employees to finish the culture of Mujhe Kya, Mera Kya? and do public work with responsibility and integrity.

Now there is another type of govt employee for whom govt service is a responsibility towards public to be done with निष्टआ अवन ईमानदारी i.e. integrity and honesty.

Second type of govt employees would go to purpose and object of their service to public and conduct work from the point of view of service to people and wherever possible try to be helpful and do whatever is required to justify their service and be helpful to public without any expectation of illegal gratification.

KD Aggarwal.

who would criticise the judiciary?

Litigants and appellants, who are court regulars, know many ugly inside truths about judges. They know about courtroom politics, malpractices, habits and biases of judges, and the channels through which they are routinely approached for corruption. On a conservative estimate, there are a hundred persons in every court who are potentially whistle-blowers.

What prevents these people from actually blowing the whistle? Most of them are keeping quiet because they don't want to jeopardize their own cases.

These are the people with perfect locus-standi and cause-of-action for speaking up against the court, because they are among the most affected by malpractices and corruption. Sadly, they are silent because they feel like hostages rather than users of the judicial service provided by the nation.
It is ironic that they are keeping quiet precisely because they have so little faith in the system. And so the system goes on unchecked... because all its stakeholders are part of the conspiracy of silence for their own special reasons.

Undertrials and convicts in jail have maximum knowledge about the human-rights abuses that our judges and lawyers are committing on a daily basis. They must be allowed to speak. We must find a way to give them back their voices.

Miscarriage of justice is the norm in our country, not the exception. Due to multiple faults in our system, many of the people currently in jail don't deserve to be there. They are there because of an undue and unjust process.

The judiciary derives most of its power from this ancient, barbaric custom of sending people into dungeons, and depriving them of family and normal society. It has almost absolute power to jail us on one or the other pretext, and it derives its moral authority from our mind-numbing fear of being judged and found guilty of something or the other.

What is worse, We The People have blocked prisoners out of our consciousness. We have excommunicated them, and most of us believe that they are not citizens at all, but just outcasts, evildoers and worthless trash. That is our fatal mistake.
This is how our tyrannical judiciary divides us into haves and have-nots. We, who have freedom, despise the have-nots and will never speak for them. We are afraid of becoming like them.

Judges are India's undisputed aristocratic class. They have almost nothing to fear. They live in a perfect bubble of privilege. No matter how corrupt or criminal they are -- individually and collectively -- they cannot be punished. Every attempt to impeach a corrupt judge since Independence has miserably failed.

All judges are part of a grand CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE. For the most part, the only thing that they have to fear is peer-pressure and social boycott by their own brother-judges. They know of every malpractice and corruption of the judiciary, and some, like Chief Justices, briefly enjoy the power to DIRECTLY FIGHT these evils if they wish. But rather than fighting this great disease and antagonizing their colleagues, they maintain a "judicious silence".

Even the courageous few who speak out -- like Justice Ruma Pal -- pacify their conscience by making cryptic comments and criticisms, rather than exposing the entire dirty system with details. That too, mostly after retirement.

India is on her knees in prayer, awaiting the day when a few experienced judges will respond to the call of conscience and fearlessly decide to reform the judicial system.

Lawyers and court insiders have detailed knowledge of how citizens are wrongfully deprived of their life, liberty, justice and hope. They know of various judges' corruption, malpractices and bad habits. And yet, even the honest ones among them suppress their conscience and keep quiet.
This is because they have much to lose if they open their mouths, and much to gain by keeping their mouths shut and taking advantage of the faults in the system.

Sarkaar shares a cozy relationship with the judiciary, particularly with the important judges who hear Writ Petitions & PILs. Neither Govt. of India nor any state government wants judiciary to become a truly effective checks-and-balance mechanism in our democracy. In fact, the more slow and unresponsive judiciary is, the easier it becomes for any sarkaar to keep common people and activists under control!
Judiciary is a crowd-control mechanism that enables the State to suppress the people who dissent. It is NOT a justice mechanism.
This is a sad reality that We The People must work hard to change.

 Although our netas -- ruling party as well as opposition -- publicly take up issues relating to common man, they keep quiet about judiciary. The reason is, there are always criminal cases pending against almost every neta, dragging on for decades. So judges always have a firm grip on their egg-rolls, and can squeeze very hard if annoyed.

 

Even firebrand journalists avoid reporting on or writing editorials on the glaring foibles of the judiciary, because being held in contempt jeopardizes their career.
And of course because media houses don't give them any opportunities to criticize the judiciary, in the first place. It is considered too risky... and media houses, after all, are commercial ventures and not crusaders.

Although their sources often give journalists authentic documentary information about many wrongdoings in lower and higher judiciary, media bosses are afraid of publishing such stories... because of the well-known tendency of judges to interpret the law of contempt in their own favour and pass draconian orders against the media house and journalists.

Why many of well-known anti-corruption activists and human rights champions maintaining silence over judiciary? Is it the fear that they may have to go to jail for contempt? Or are they afraid of tarnishing their brand value by going where media may not support them.

For the ills of our nation, the public generally points fingers at the political parties, government, police, bureaucracy, etc. But it is very rare that anybody points fingers at the judiciary. Why this conspiracy of silence?
Let us discuss the reasons why various stakeholders or interest-groups have remained silent for decades... starting with the common man.
And let us ask whether keeping silent is good for the nation.

Source; Social Media, the Indian Jury of developed judicial system of West.