traffic analytics

Justice is where Judges follow Law-KD Aggarwal. Powered by Blogger.

If Judgments were based on law, every lawyer will get same fees!-KD Aggarwal

Facts and Statute are Not Relevant. They are invented / concealed / amended by corrupt Judges - KD Aggarwal.

Let us make India Corruption free

The matter and inference drawn are based on actual personal experiences of Author. They are meant to serve as beacon to those who may find themselves in similar situations to save themselves from clutches of unscrupulous persons. They are also meant to serve as an eye opener to those men who are sitting at Helm of Affairs for improvement of judicial system and corruption free India, so that never again one says; "the law court is not a cathedral (what they used to be) but a casino where so much depends on the throw of the dice (and money). K R Narayanan http://www.krnarayanan.in/html/speeches/others/jan28_00.htm

Transparency improves Accountability

Every Judge is Public Servant and thus accountable for his acts. Transparency of Complaints against Judges and instant stringent action for perjury and violation of their oath will improve Dignity of Courts and Justice delivery.

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Gopal Singhal lied to use her sister to ward off his debt.

The accident in my life;
Gopal Singhal Son of Jagan Nath - Jagan Jewelers, Sec 26, Chandigarh

Following is part of Public Records contained in Criminal Appeal 712 of 2001 in High court of New Delhi;
1.     That the Gopal appeared as witness in HMA case titled Rajni Aggarwal V/S Kapil Dev Aggarwal in the court of Sh. S. S. Lamba, ADJ Chandigarh. While appearing as PW 2 on behalf of the Rajni, on 16.3.98 he swore to state the truth but however he made various statements in the Court which were false and which he knew to be false to his knowledge.  He thus committed an offence by deliberately giving false evidence.  The statements which were made by the Gopal under oath knowing  them to be false are as reproduced hereunder:-

2.     That the Gopal Singal made the following false statement before this court.
"I cannot tell the exact amount of initial capital invested in my company (M/s Gopal Sales Pvt.  Ltd.). The  company  started  in  April nineteen something.  I do not remember  the  exact  year.   I do not remember the amount invested by me personally in the company. However, it is wrong to suggest that it was only Rs. 7000/-. I can neither deny nor admit that I took Rs. 10.00 Lacs  from  Raj  Singal as  loan  for investment in the company.  Similarly I cannot tell the exact  amount of loan taken from Brij Singal.  It may or may not be Rs 5.00 Lacs. It is wrong to suggest that it was taken over by  Mr.   Raj  Singal because I could not return the loan taken by the company.  It is wrong to suggest that the company was  in  financial  crisis and I sought financial help from my sister Rajni."
Proof of falsity.
Gopal had independently started his business venture in the name of Gopal Sales Pvt, Limited.  No person can forget so easily and so soon the first business of his life particularly his own investments, major loans which he took and from which relatives and why the said business was taken over by those relatives. The statements made above are apparently false to his own knowledge.

4.     Gopal knowingly and deliberately made the following false statement regarding Rajni before this court under oath " I cannot say whether my sister knows car driving or not. I have not seen her driving. I do not know whether my sister was having a valid car driving license before marriage or not."

Proof of falsity.
The driving license of the Rajni is exhibit D 15 on record which has been admitted by his father. This license was issued on 6.2.89.  Rajni was married on 14.4.93.  Thus, for full 4 years prior to marriage the Rajni was driving the family car having a valid car driving license.  It is false if her brother says he does not know whether Rajni drives a car or not or that he has never seen her driving. The Gopal has knowingly made a false statement as submitted above.

5.     The Gopal has deliberately made the following false statement:- "I cannot recognize the handwriting of my father."
Proof of Falsity;
Gopal has all along lived with his father and always worked under him and on the date of evidence was working under him.  The statement made by him is apparently false to his knowledge.

6.     The Gopal has further knowingly made following false statements-"It is wrong to suggest that  on  receiving  a  telephone  from  the Rajni I along with my father, Brij Singal, Cousin Pardeep  and  my mother with some laborers came to the house  of  the  me I  and forcible removed all  house  hold  goods  most of  which  were  self acquired by the Kapil and ransacked the house and misbehaved with  him. it is also wrong to suggest that the  Rajni went with us. It is also wrong to suggest that the Rajni after leaving his house with us operated the locker in  Sector  37  in  the Company of Mr. Brij Singal and removed all  the  valuable  worth  more than Rs.30.00 lacs lying in  the  said  locker.  It  is  incorrect  to suggest that all the valuable including  ancestral  gold of  Kapil and his parents was  sold  off to repay the debts incurred by me for starting the  company  Gopal Sales Pvt.Ltd. It is incorrect to suggest that I did not give any gift to the Rajni. It is wrong to suggest we never went to Kapil’s houses by taking a Panchayat. It is wrong  to suggest that I have deposed falsely  for  my  own  personal  financial gains".
Proof of falsity.
Testimony of Late Sh.B.L.Premi, Assistant Branch
Manager, PNB Sector 37, Chandigarh.
Testimony of Dr. Inderjit Dewan. Prof.Emeritus.
Testimony of Sh.S.K.Mishrk.
Testimony of Sh.Pavitar Kumar.

What happened in Appeal.


KAPIL DEV AGGARWAL.



No comments:

Post a Comment