traffic analytics

Justice is where Judges follow Law-KD Aggarwal. Powered by Blogger.

If Judgments were based on law, every lawyer will get same fees!-KD Aggarwal

Facts and Statute are Not Relevant. They are invented / concealed / amended by corrupt Judges - KD Aggarwal.

Let us make India Corruption free

The matter and inference drawn are based on actual personal experiences of Author. They are meant to serve as beacon to those who may find themselves in similar situations to save themselves from clutches of unscrupulous persons. They are also meant to serve as an eye opener to those men who are sitting at Helm of Affairs for improvement of judicial system and corruption free India, so that never again one says; "the law court is not a cathedral (what they used to be) but a casino where so much depends on the throw of the dice (and money). K R Narayanan http://www.krnarayanan.in/html/speeches/others/jan28_00.htm

Transparency improves Accountability

Every Judge is Public Servant and thus accountable for his acts. Transparency of Complaints against Judges and instant stringent action for perjury and violation of their oath will improve Dignity of Courts and Justice delivery.

Thursday, May 1, 2014

Evidence of Theft / Immoral conduct.

Following is part of Public Records contained in FAO 424 of 2001 in High court of New Delhi;
Rajni has made the following irreconcilable contradictory statements under oath with respect to the contents and operation of the locker whereby she stole my ancestral property now worth more than Rs 5.00 Crores or 50 million.:-
 A REPLICATION DATED 3.8.1996 
Para 5 n " ..No jewelry was placed in the locker.  The jewelry is with me.  Photostat copy of the writing by me is attached."
Rajni later on amended her petition. No changes were made by me in para 5n of his reply but Rajni Changed her Replication Qua Contents of Locker and now stated in Para 5n as under:- 
REPLICATION DATED 7-11-1997
Para 5 n "..In fact whatever jewellery was kept in the locker a list was given by me to the Rajni and apart from the said list there was no other item worth a single penny in the locker."
B. In replication dt. 3.8.96. & reply dated 1.6.1996,  Rajni  had stated in Para 5n/4 that none of the gold  ornaments were  ever  placed in the Locker and that they were  with  me and my family and that I had categorically  given my  writing dated 19.4.1993 in my hand giving  the details  of gold ornaments which were in my,  mother/father's possession. Now on 27.1.98 in her testimony before the Hon'ble trial Court she has stated that all gold ornaments were in fact placed in the Locker, the list of which was prepared which is dated 19.4.93. This statement now made in court falsifies her averment made in para 5n/4 of her replication dt. 3.8.96. & reply dt 1-6-96.
C. As regards the purpose, she stated in para 4 of her replication dated 7.11.1997 that she operated the Locker to get the original educational certificates which were to be submitted by her to Kurukshetra University from where she wanted to do B.Ed. by Correspondence.  It has now come on record vide P/1 and P/2(on record of trial Court) that she was already admitted to Kurukshetra University and had in fact written to Kurukshetra University seeking return of those certificates and degrees. In response to her request for return of her degrees and certificates Kurukshetra University wrote to her vide Ex.P-1 dt. 25.04.96 that all her degrees and certificates had already been sent to her address mentioned in the admission form. Thus apparently she knew where her degree were and also sought their return from Kurukshetra University where they were sent on 16.8.96 by a registered post. The original receipt is in my possession. Vide Ex d-35 (Record of visits maintained by the Bank) it shows that last two operations of the locker were made by the Rajni Apparently she knew the contents of the locker when she operated the same on 08.09.1995 and 15.9.95.  It was certainly not to get any certificate or degrees but under instigation of her parents to remove steal and misappropriate our valuable property worth 30 lacs now worth more than Rs 5.00 Crores or 50 million which was lying in the said locker.
D. In her examination in chief on 27.1.96 she has stated as under: " On 15.9.95 in the morning I quarreled with her Since it was a daily affair. I went out to go to my Bank to fetch my certificate I found that the same were not lying in the locker as I have sent the same to Kurukshetra University.  The certificates of 8th and 10th were lying in the locker. However, the same were not required. 
PROOF OF FALSITY
In her cross examination she has stated " I took out those certificate with me. I had gone to collect the certificate of 8th and 10th standard. When in the examination in chief I said the same were of no use I said it because of confusion." There was no confusion.  There was theft of our property and ancestral gold and ancestral gold jewelry then worth Rs 30.00 lacs and now worth more than Rs 5.00 Crores or 50.0 million by Rajni. 

E. She has further stated in her para 4 of replication dated 7.11.97 that no jewellery and other valuable worth 30.00 lacs were lying in the locker on 15.9.95. As at the time of its operation on 15.9.95 when the Rajni went to fetch her certificates and degrees, the locker was found empty.
PROOF OF FALSITY
It has been suggested to me by counsel for the Rajni as below: "It is wrong to suggest that I have taken all the articles from the locker at the time when I have put my signatures on the ledger." As per R-11 R-12 Rajni has operated the locker on 8.9.95 and 15.9.95, in case  I had  removed  everything at the time he lastly signed  on  the  ledger, Rajni was bound to be aware of the same on 8.9.95 when she operated the locker and there was thus no reason  for her to operate the locker again on 15.9.95, when she admittedly left the house. As such it falsifies her averment made in her replication dt. 7-11-97.

F.  As regards timing of the operation of locker Rajni stated in her examination on 27-1-98 that in the morning she had quarreled with her husband and had gone to the bank to fetch her Certificates and Degrees.
PROOF OF FALSITY
This statement is falsified by R-12 i.e. the locker account where she herself has mentioned the time of operation of the locker on 15.9.95 as 3.45 P M i.e. in the evening.
       
G. She further stated under oath as below as regards of locker   "I never required my husband to bring any particular jewelry from the locker. I also never required my husband to bring the jewelry and except on 8-9-1995 I never accompanied my husband to operate the locker".
PROOF OF FALSITY
That the trial Court has recorded following demeanor of Rajni.
"Affidavit dated 10-11-1997 filed by me in this court bears my signature.   After the contents in para 10 are put to the witness where she had said that after 19-4-1993 she had been operating the locker for social functions, she said that she could not remember all the events".         

H. That immediately after marriage parties had taken a joint locker on 19.4.93 being No.231 PNB Sector 37 CHANDIGARH (also mentioned in order relied upon by the Rajni) and jewelry, Indira Vikas Patras and other miscellaneous items including Gold and gold coins/silver coins were kept therein.   However, soon after marriage parents of Rajni took away part of the jewelry belonging to the Rajni. This fact came to my knowledge when the same was recovered from her parents house when income tax raids were conducted in may 1994 at the house of her uncle who lived in same house as her parents.  When the I asked Rajni as to how her jewelry is with her parents, she stated that her parents are not very rich and the jewelry was given for a show off to her paternal uncles families and immediately after marriage her parents had sought return of real jewelry, which she had done.  This fact is also mentioned in para 5 n of the written statement filed in the trial Court. When confronted with this fact during the testimony under oath before the Trial Court she had to say as below:
"It is correct that in 1994 Income tax raids were conducted in my parents house.  My personal jewelry was also recovered during that raid. volunteered, it was given to the  me at  that very time. The jewelry, which I was wearing in April, 1994 at the time of marriage of my cousin sister Rashmi were recovered in the raids conducted on the premises of my parents because after the marriage I had left that jewelry which I was wearing at the residence of my parents".
PROOF OF FALSITY
In fact the marriage of Rashmi was performed on 19th April 1995, whereas it was recovered from her parents house in May 1994 a year before marriage of Rashmi. This is so proved in Ex.D1/x and also in the statement of PW4 Brij Singal father of Rashmi who has stated that his daughter Rashmi was married on 19.4.95 at Mandi Gobindgarh.
4. The above statements conclusively prove the theft of property by Rajni and her brother and father/parents.  The property now worth more than Rs 5.00 Crores was my ancestral property and was given to me by my parents. I had been entrusted with the same and I kept the property in my possession in a joint locker. Rajni in collusion instigation and active participation of her Parents and her brother and at their instance and benefit removed the said property without my consent and knowledge. 
5. That entire movable property belonging to me and my parents now worth more than Rs 5.00 Crores or 50 Million was stolen by Rajni and her parents due their habit and indebtedness. Rajni has also made extra judicial confession regarding this property before the court of Justice Swatantar Kumar(From Delhi High Court) during the course of reconciliation Proceedings during hearing of Civil Revision 3387/99.
6.  Rajni  under the influence and instigation of her parents, with their common intention to devour the property of lacs of Rupees lying in the locker made up her mind to leave the matrimonial home. Unknown to the Me she operated his family locker on 8th of September, 1995 and on 15th of September and left the home on 15.9.95 alongwith all household goods i.e. Sofa-set, Double Bed, suit cases, entire crockery (steel, glass and Chinaware), Beddings, AC, Godrej Almirah, Washing Machine, T.V., Dressing table, entire Wardrobe including my undergarments, furniture, Gifts given to me by my friends and relatives, every small item.  In nutshell each and every thing that a normal household has. Copy of affidavit of Pawittar kumar Truck Driver in whose truck Parents of Rajni carried the household goods belonging to me and my parents and affidavit of Sh. Santosh Mishra an independent eye witness is annexed as R-19 and R-20 respectively. Sh. Pawittar Kumar and Sh. Santosh Mishra appeared before the Trial Court as witnesses and corroborated R-2, R-3. They were duly cross examined by Padam jain advocate. As per the description given by late Sh. B.L.Premi Asst. Branch Manager, during the time of her clandestine operation of locker on 15.9.1995 she was accompanied inside the Bank by Sh.Brij Singal, to whom Jagan nath ,Gopal, etc then owed Rs. 5.00 Lacs.
Her lawyer used to inform my lawyer in advance the orders which will be passed by the concerned judge. I used to laugh thinking that judges pass the orders based on facts and law. I was wrong. Every time the same orders were passed as had already been conveyed to us. We were told of exact order on her 2nd maintenance application even when application had not even been argued. I went to inspection Judge Justice HS Brar and told him of the order which will be passed on an application which is yet to be argued. He did not believe me and said I was prejudging the issue. However, that was not to be. The same order was passed by SS Lamba then ADJ now district Judge ---. So, I informed the inspection judge. He did not believe me. He came for inspection the next day and when he saw the order which I had told him several days earlier, he withdrew the case from SS lamba and sent to another Judge. I did not get justice in my case as only remedy against a corrupt judgment is to file appeal. Click here for what happened in appeal

After this I tracked the telephone calls of my in-laws and found that before every date of hearing a telephone call went from my in-laws to Mangat Ram Garg, chairman department of laws, Punjabi University, Patiala and instantly Mangat Ram Garg telephoned Balram Gupta, Chairman Department of laws Punjab University, Chandigarh. Balram Gupta in turn then called B B parson, then ADJ now district Judge .. who would then call concerned Judge SS Lamba.

I later came to know that Mangat Ram Garg, Balram Gupta and BB parson are all known touts, who supply Judges albeit their orders on a platter for lifelong pleasure for litigants unlike prostitutes who give pleasure for only half an hour or less.


No comments:

Post a Comment