traffic analytics

Justice is where Judges follow Law-KD Aggarwal. Powered by Blogger.

If Judgments were based on law, every lawyer will get same fees!-KD Aggarwal

Facts and Statute are Not Relevant. They are invented / concealed / amended by corrupt Judges - KD Aggarwal.

Let us make India Corruption free

The matter and inference drawn are based on actual personal experiences of Author. They are meant to serve as beacon to those who may find themselves in similar situations to save themselves from clutches of unscrupulous persons. They are also meant to serve as an eye opener to those men who are sitting at Helm of Affairs for improvement of judicial system and corruption free India, so that never again one says; "the law court is not a cathedral (what they used to be) but a casino where so much depends on the throw of the dice (and money). K R Narayanan http://www.krnarayanan.in/html/speeches/others/jan28_00.htm

Transparency improves Accountability

Every Judge is Public Servant and thus accountable for his acts. Transparency of Complaints against Judges and instant stringent action for perjury and violation of their oath will improve Dignity of Courts and Justice delivery.

Thursday, July 16, 2015

How to control menace of Dowry?

How many girls want dowry-less marriage? 

Boy; I believe in Dowry-less marriage. Neither I will take dowry nor I will give any dowry.

Girl; How Cute So what does not giving dowry means, never heard that boys give dowry?

Boy: 
If Girl gives me a gold ring I will also give only gold ring of same weight and price, if she gives me diamond ring she also gets diamond ring of same weight and price. If girl gives me one pant shirt in marriage. I will also give her one salvar Kameez, if she gives me three piece suit, I will also give her saree, blouse petticoat. at time of marriage, I will reciprocate her one doe one two for and so on.. of same price. after marriage she will enjoy same standard of food, clothing leisure as other ladies of our house. 

Girl; (Little shocked) what else?

Boy; I do not mind girl giving her share in her parents and ancestral property to her father or brother by giving them affidavit that she will not claim her share in her parents/ancestral property, but likewise, She takes marriage vow and gives me an affidavit that she will not claim any share in my parents /ancestral property or Income.

Girl; (fully shocked) what else?

Boy; I will share domestic work of looking after our cooks, drivers and maids, But if she is earning, than she is also responsible to share domestic and other expenses /responsibilities as per her income and household requirement. 


Girl fainted?

Boy; I believe in dowry-less marriage. Neither I will take dowry nor I will give any dowry. How many girls, her parents believe in not taking dowry for girls in her marriage ?

Boys do not eye property of parents of girl and similarly while selecting grooms. Girls and their parents should not have eye for property and wealth of parents of boy.

If girl puts in her income in family pool it only means that she considers her husband as her family. If girl is not working, it is duty of boys to provide girl all amenities of life as are available to all members of family including clothes, food, entertainment leisure, travel, gold, diamonds etc.

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

False allegations to Loot money.

Following is part of Public Records contained in Criminal Appeal 711 of 2001 in High court of New Delhi; Judge Murlidhar dismissed it without quoting pleadings facts evidence Or Constitution and IPC by saying it is delaying tactic. Wow. The below mentioned false allegations were leveled on him for the sake of looting and cheating me of Rs 50 million by girl's family.
False Allegations of Cruelty:-
7.1. It has been stated by the Rajni that I used to make demands of various house hold articles and upon failure of Rajni to fulfill those demands, I started abusing Rajni and gave her beatings and more and more demands for dowry and money were raised from Rajni.
      
7.2. I used to give beatings to the Rajni on one pretext or another and forced her to bring money from her parents to meet expenses and daily need of my house, on refusal of the Rajni not acceding to these unreasonable demands I used to give beating to her at the instance of my parents.
       
PROOF OF FALSITY
Averments are vague and general in nature. No particular or specific instance has been given or stated as to what was actually demanded. On contrary I used to give her gifts of Jewellery from time to time out of my own income. It has been proved by RW 8 Sh. S.M. Sharma officer Bank of Rajasthan that Cheque No. 715452 was drawn by me from my account in favor of M/s Nippy Jewelers for a sum of Rs, 9800/-. Statement of Bank account is Ex.D-31 and Copy of Cheque is Ex.D-32. This cheque was to make payment of a Gold Set as gift to Rajni on her Birthday. Another witness RW 10 Sh. Ranbir Singh Officer Punjab National Bank Sector 37 has proved cheque Dt. 12th April 1995  issued  in name of Sham Sunder Kapoor (Proprietor Nippy Jeweller) Ex.D36. This cheque was encash by RW17 Rahul Kumar helper Nippy Jeweller who has proved his signatures on the cheque as  Ex.D44. This cheque was for a sum of Rs, 12,000/- for payment of gold necklace o marriage anniversary. Copy of the bill of gold necklace is Ex.D-45.
       
It has been stated by me in para 5b of the written statement and also in evidence that parties had gone for a three week long Honeymoon to Kinnaur from where they returned on 13th of May, 1993. Parties had gone to Delhi on last week of May, 1993 and had stayed in hotel Lee Meridien New Delhi where daily room rent is Rs 5,000/-. In June 1993 parties had gone to Missouri during holidays.  In June, 1994 parties had gone to Mashobara, Naldhera etc.  In December, 1994 parties had gone to Kufri and Narkanda etc.  In June 1995 they had gone to Kasauli. In July, 1995 to Shimla.

Above facts have been admitted by the Rajni in her Para 5 b of her replication dated 7.11.97. Where she has stated as: “ Parties went to the places as mentioned in the written statement.” Father of the Rajni has shown ignorance of the parties to have gone to any of these places, all the money was spent by the Me.  As I am giving gifts of jewelry to the Rajni out of my own income and taking her to various holidays every few months to all the places mentioned above, the statement made in para 1 and 2 above are obviously false to the knowledge of the Rajni It has also been stated by me I that Rajni was given gifts of jewelry by my parents on the festival of Teej in July, 1993 and also on account her birthdays on 12th of August, 1994 and 1995.
Since on these occasions it was ancestral gold or payment was made by in cash hence no regular bill was issued or taken by the me.

False Allegations
7.3 Rajni alleges that she was kept without food for successive days.
PROOF THE FALSITY
Rajni has also stated in examination and cross examination that she had separate kitchen. I am an Advocate and has to go out in connection with his work to the courts. Obviously the Kitchen can't be taken by me to court. Exhibit D1 is the diary, which has been admitted by her.  Various pages of this dairy written by her in her own hand show that parties used to go to various restaurants of the city for eating Chinese, South Indian and Non-Veg. food. This fact was also admitted by her in para 5n of her replication dt.3.8.1996.

False Allegations       
7.4   It has been alleged by the Rajni that after two weeks of marriage when the parties returned from their tour father-in-law of the Rajni became angry upon her and started giving abuses to her without any reason.
PROOF OF FALSITY
It has been stated by me, that parties had gone on honeymoon after one week of marriage and had returned on 13th of May, 1993. As such after two weeks of marriage parties were nowhere near Chandigarh. In her cross examination she has stated as below:-
"For honeymoon we had gone to beyond Shimla to a place not remember now. We spent 15 to 20 days on that account. We went for honeymoon after about 7 days." Obviously Rajni was not in Chandigarh after two weeks of marriage as per her own statement thus my father saying anything to her after two weeks or anytime thereafter are false.
    
False Allegations       
7.5 It has been alleged by Rajni that she was asked to wash her own clothes whereas I and my parents gave their own cloths to washer man. 
PROOF OF FALSITY
It has been stated by the Rajni in her cross examination as follows:-"My father in law was having a washing machine"

Obviously if my parents have a washing machine there is no question of giving our cloths to washer man.  It has further been stated by RW13 Gopal Krishan Proprietor Krishna Dyers and Dry cleaners that the cloths of the Rajni was always dry cleaned at his shop.

False Allegations;       
7.6     It was further alleged that Rajni was doing the domestic work and was called a servant. She was called upon to clean the courtyard of the house and work from 7 A.M. to 10 P.M.
PROOF OF FALSITY
Her diary Exhibit D1/C has been admitted by the Rajni in which she has maintained the account of the salary paid to maid servant. Maid had been hired for cleaning courtyard/floors and washing of utensils.  Admittedly there are only two or three members in the house.  After I separated from my parents because of her, there was nothing for her to do expect to cook food for her-self and (one time) for me I. Inspite of specific question put to her in cross examination as to what she was called upon to do through out the day. She could not give any answer as to what kept her busy. Above statement is false to the knowledge of the Rajni.
       
False Allegations     
7.7    It is alleged that me I and his parents gave abuses to her when she tried to attend a telephone call from her parents.
PROOF OF FALSITY
It has been stated by the Rajni in her cross-examination as follows:- "After separation of the kitchen my brother in law S.C.Diwan  also give me telephone connection which  was  lying unused  with  them.  I got it affixed in my Bedroom.  After installation of the telephone I was free to use the telephone in the manner I desired. It  has been proved by RW5  Naresh Kumar  Section  supervisors Office  of General Manager telephones that  telephone  bearing No.  691671 of S.C.Diwan was installed on 6.1.94 which continued right uptil 15.9.95.       
       
False Allegations;
7.8  It has been alleged by the Rajni that I and my parents misbehaved with her brother for insufficiency of birthday gifts brought by him.
PROOF OF FALSITY;
It was stated by the Rajni that she comes of a poor family with 5 sisters. No body had ever celebrated her birthday, accordingly parents of the applicant celebrated her birthday in a lavish style. Lavish gifts were given  to  her. This was not liked by her parents who felt degraded.  Birthday Gifts  are always meant for birthday person and admittedly  it was  the birthday of the Rajni which was  celebrated  for the first time in her life by the Me and my parents.

False Allegations;       
7.9  Rajni has alleged that she was kept locked in the house.
PROOF OF FALSITY
I am living in house No. 1366 Sector 40-B, Chandigarh since 1989. On the ground floor of the my house there are ten doors which open outside out of which seven cannot be bolted from outside and on the first floor there are four doors which open outside and again out of which three cannot be bolted from outside. Obviously in this situation no body can be locked in a house since majority of the doors cannot be bolted from outside.

False Allegations;      
7.10 Rajni has alleged that, I would find fault with the food prepared by the her & in March 1994, threw utensils on her face and did not provide any medical aid to her and in November 1994 quarreled with her.
PROOF OF FALSITY
The demeanor of the my wife has been noted by the Trial Court as below:
"The witness was standing mum when the counsel asked her as to what happen in November 1994 However the counsel has now given hints with regard to meals to which witness states that it was daily routine".
       
False Allegations;
7.11  Rajni has alleged that she was called "Banjh".
PROOF OF FALSITY
It has been stated by Rajni in her cross examination as under:
"Only my husband accompanied me whenever I went to the doctor for treatment for infertility. The expenses in that behalf was also met only by my husband”.
It has been stated by her brother Gopal Singal;
"I never accompanied my sister for any treatment.  She never told me about her treatment.
PW3 Jagannath Father of the Rajni stated:
"Rajni did not disclose to me with respect to medical treatment. I came to know about it only after filing of the written statement."

Obviously parents brother of the Rajni are least bothered about her health as per their own statement they are not even aware that she was under medical treatment for medical problems since her childhood for which me I spent approximately 5-7 lacs. Rajni has admitted her medical reports D2 to D7 none of which indicate any normalcy in her and which continued right uptil August, 1995 Obviously if I was calling her "Banjh" I would not got her treated.  It was her parents never cared her or for her medical health either before marriage or after marriage and knew about her medical problems and called her "banjh" and advised her to leave the matrimonial home by removing/stealing everything she can get hold of. They were aware of her medical condition.
       
False Allegations       
7.12 It has been stated by the Rajni that a medical check up was got by her from a doctor at Patiala and it was discovered that there was no medical weakness in her and she is able to provide the child. She further states that I is claiming that there is a medical report with him from the doctor at Chandigarh. The said report is false and fabricated.
PROOF OF FALSITY
Rajni has stated as below in her cross examination:  "D2 to D7 are the prescription slips and treatment slips pertaining to my treatment got done by my husband". The report D7 which she stated to be false and fabricated has now been admitted by her. The treatment chart of the Rajni by the Doctor at Patiala is on record which points out various birth defects in her. I also examined the Gynecologist who had examined her and who proved her report Ex D-7.  Her various reports admitted by her EX D2 to EX D7 indicate problems in her egg formation, vaginal secretion and Vaginal infection irregular periods etc.       

False Allegations;
7.13  Rajni alleges that her parents gave dowry of 70,000 which has been retained by me since 19.4.93.
PROOF OF FALSITY
In fact parents of the Rajni had taken away the jewelry which fact came to his knowledge on May 4, 1994 when the same was recovered by the income tax authorities from the house of parents of Rajni.  Rajni states as follows in her cross examination.  It is correct that in 1994 Income tax raids were conducted at my uncles house. We live jointly with him. My jewelry was also recovered during that raid. The jewelry which I was wearing in April, 1994 at the time of marriage of my cousin sister Rashmi were recovered in the raids conducted on the premises because after her marriage I had left that jewelry which I was wearing at the resident of my parents".
       
In fact the marriage of Rashmi was performed on 19th April, 1995 a year after the same was recovered from her parents house which is so proved in Ex.D1/x and also in the statement of PW4 Brij Singal father of Rashmi who has stated that his daughter  Rashmi was married on  19.4.95  at  Mandi Gobindgarh.
       
False Allegations
7.14    Rajni has stated in Para 5b of her  replication dated  3.8.96 that me I used to take the  Rajni  to unknown places and later on it came to light on the filing  of written statement that it was for medical check  up/treatment. In para 5j of her replication dated 3.8.96 she has stated that all the operations, tests and treatments were against the wishes, consent, knowledge of the Rajni. The fact of treatment, operation etc. were never brought to the knowledge of the Rajni.
PROOF OF FALSITY
Accused Rajni admits-"Only my husband accompanied me whenever I went to the Doctor for treatment with regard to fertility. The expenses in that regard was also met by my husband." D2 to D7 are the prescription slips and treatment slips pertaining to my treatment got done by my husband". Her statement that she was not aware that she was got treated till the filling of the written statement is patently false to her knowledge.
       
False Allegations       
7.15  Rajni alleges that once her mother in law sprinkled kerosene oil in the kitchen and sent her to prepare tea.  When she went to the kitchen she came outside after getting the smell of the Kerosene oil. Her mother in law came on her back and again pushed the Rajni into the kitchen and tried her best to set her on fire.
PROOF OF FALSITY
       
Rajni does not remember the year, month or the date of the incident. Rajni has stated as below in her cross examination.  "My mother in law must be in her 70's. Kerosene has never been used in my in-laws house for domestic purposes".
       
Admittedly Rajni a strong and robust girl of 30 cannot be oushed any a sick, old, frail women of 70+ particularly when she suffers from arthritis of both knee joints since more than 10 years and has lumbarston-dylitis for which she took treatment from Saket Hospital.

RW12 Doctor V.K.Rampal has proved that mother of the me I is 70 years old and is under his treatment for obesity. He has further deposed that She has arthritis of both knee joints since more than 10 years and has lumbarston-dylitis for which she took treatment from Saket Hospital.  She cannot walk properly and maintain her balance. Moreover, she walks  with  a walking stick which has three  supports  unlike other walking stick which has a single support. She cannot even get up from the bed without support.
       
False Allegations;       
7.16   Rajni alleges that after Jan.95, I never had sexual inter-course with her. Neither offered myself to her.
PROOF OF FALSITY
Rajni has admitted in her cross examination:
"I went to Patiala after 23.5.95 for medical check up. Prior to that I had sexual intercourse with my husband".  "It is correct that in May 1995 as suggested by the Doctor, I committed sexual intercourse in the Clinic itself with my husband for the Post coital test to be performed by the Doctor."
       
Rajni  has also admitted in her cross  examination  documents Ex. D4 and D5. On both these documents dates for sexual intercourse have been written by Doctor Gurinder Bhatia who is neighbor of her parents. The dates are 2,4,5,7,9,11 of October 1994. The dates in Ex.D5 are all in the month of January 1995 i.e. 12,14,15,17,19,  Jan. In Ex.D1/E admitted by her, date mentioned is  18th  May 1995  for the purpose of PCT, which a  test  performed after sexual intercourse. In Ex.D6 19th of June, 1995 is the date of sexual intercourse as proved by Dr  Mangla Dogra RW19.
       
RW14 Doctor A.C.Chadha Uttam Laboratory has proved Ex.D40 the pregnancy test reports of the Rajni conducted on 30.4.95 and Ex.D41 pregnancy test report of Rajni dt.27.6.95. Pregnancy test reports are required only in case of child expectance which happens after sexual intercourse.  RW19 Doctor Mangla Dogra has proved that she conducted Ultra sounds upon Rajni in the month of June 1995  and August 1995 for the purpose of egg formation and  to be  advised  for the dates of sexual  intercourse.  RW-19 has further stated as:- "Patient did not complain to me   that   no  sexual  intercourse  was  performed   by  her husband”.  Rajni has also admitted that she was treated for infertility from doctor at Patiala. All these tests and treatment were for the purpose that she could conceive.
       
Counsel of Rajni has made the following suggestion to RW 19.  "Ex.D2 to D7 which are of different dates and are from different doctors shows the curiosity of the husband to have a child." It is an established fact that sexual intercourse is necessary to have a child.

False Allegations;     
7.17 Rajni alleges that on 15.9.95, I gave severe beating and turned her out of the House in three clothes retaining all the articles and Istri Dhan.
PROOF OF FALSITY;
RW10 Ranbir Singh officer Punjab National Bank, Sector 37 has proved the record of Locker account maintained by the parties with the bank.  Ex.D34, D35 are the copies of the entries showing visits for the operation of the locker. As per Ex.D35 the locker was operated on 15.9.95 at 3.45 P.M. by Rajni.
       
A person who has been beaten by her husband and turned out of her house in three clothes would not coolly operate the family locker of the applicant and walk away with property / Gold worth more than Rs 5.00 crores.

False Allegations;       
7.18 In para 3 to preliminary submissions of her replication dated 7.11.97 Rajni has stated as follows:  "The my husband prior to marriage during the subsistence of marriage and even now is residing with his parents in his house. He never separated or segregated from his parents. The allegations of living apart in the same house at the instance of Rajni from 15.11.93 onwards are wrong and denied.
PROOF OF FALSITY
Rajni had submitted a letter dated 30.12.93 along with list of documents on 16.8.96. Father of the Rajni had admitted the same as Ex.D16 In this letter Dt. 30.12.93 Rajni has stated:-" He (my husband) says that  he  has left/separated  from  his parents because of me and I  do  not respect him, Papa he is right".

Inspite of this Truth and above evidence, I did not get justice. Her lawyer used to inform my lawyer in advance the orders which will be passed by the concerned judge. I used to laugh thinking that judges pass the orders based on facts and law. I was wrong. Every time the same orders were passed as had already been conveyed to us. We were told of exact order on her 2nd maintenance application even when application had not even been argued. I went to inspection Judge Justice HS Brar and told him of the order which will be passed on an application which is yet to be argued. He did not believe me and said I was prejudging the issue. However, that was not to be. The same order was passed by SS Lamba then ADJ now district Judge ---. So, I informed the inspection judge. He did not believe me. He came for inspection the next day and when he saw the order which I had told him several days earlier, he withdrew the case from SS lamba and sent to another Judge. I did not get justice in my case as only remedy against a corrupt judgment is to file appeal. Click here for what happened in appeal. 

After this I tracked the telephone calls of my in-laws and found that before every date of hearing a telephone call went from my in-laws to Mangat Ram Garg, chairman department of laws, Punjabi University, Patiala and instantly Mangat Ram Garg telephoned Balram Gupta, Chairman Department of laws Punjab University, Chandigarh. Balram Gupta in turn then called B B parson, then ADJ now district Judge .. who would then call concerned Judge SS Lamba.

I later came to know that Mangat Ram Garg, Balram Gupta and BB parson are all known touts, who supply Judges albeit their orders on a platter for lifelong pleasure for litigants unlike prostitutes who give pleasure for only half an hour or less.

Kapil Dev Aggarwal
Click here for;

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Jagjit Singh Corrupt High Court employee

To,                   Date; 11.8.2014
Registrar (E-1),
Punjab and Haryana High Court,
Chandigarh.

Sub; Complaint against jagjit Singh Supdt Liquidation branch for corruption/falsification of records of High Court /dereliction of duty/ amounting to major misconduct.
Sir,
1       Jagjit Singh is employed in liquidation branch nonstop since 2006 first as Sr. assistant on 19.7.2006, than as Superintendent Grade-II since 19.5.2010 till date. He was dealing with correspondence to and from Official Liquidator attached with High Court and judicial and administrative files. Vide letter Dt 22.1.14 I had given information regarding corruption by D P Ojha Official Liquidator and jagjit Singh of upto Rs 500 crores scam in High Court on inter-alia following grounds;-
Non preparation of inventory at time of possession by D P Ojha Official Liquidator which later facilitates theft by him in league with some employees of High Court including Jagjit Singh. Staff of D P Ojha seals the units, then D P Ojha sends in men with officials seal who then steal the assets and re-seal the units. Difference in the date of possession and date of inventory of all companies is evidence of embezzlement of its assets. In matter of Altos India, Security agency M/s CD security informed this court about theft by staff of Official Liquidator who had come to steal assets and were also in possession of official seal given by to them by official Liquidator. Justice Swatantar Kumar ordered registration of FIR. Both members of then staff Mr Datta and Mr Krishan were recently convicted by trial court. Same is situation in all cases. CD security who gave information was depaneled. Now such security agencies are given work who participate and allow theft by official liquidator D P Ojha and do not inform his misdeeds to Court. To avoid favoritism, Justice Swatantar kumar vide order Dt 28.5.1998 in CP 49/98 had ordered seriatim engagement of security agencies.

b).    Payments in names of security guards who have never been born. False names are given without any proof of identity and later salaries are claimed in their names. Enquiry report in case of claim of Rs 1.5 crores in PNFC is C-1. D P Ojha had to return back amount to PSIDC (CP 53/12). Same is situation in all cases. There is no proof of employment /existence of any security guard in any company. The amounts are misappropriated by D P ojha in league with others including Jagjit Singh.
c)      In first instance inventory is delayed and later even inventoried assets are
stolen by D P Ojha in league with some employees including Jagjit Singh. In order to hide their own theft, they lodge FIRs against unknown persons. Copies of some recent instances of FIRs are C-2. OL states in reply under RTI, that, I should seek only a reasonable number of FIRs.
d)              Sale of assets without mentioning reserve price. Norms were laid by High
Court in CP 220/05 wherein mentioning of reserve price was must. On 4/5.8.14 (CA 405/14), a property sought to be sold by OL for Rs 37.5 lacs got sold for Rs 60 Lacs i.e. 60% more which is evidence that sales done by D P Ojha are at much below realizable price. This does not happen in other courts firstly because property is sold above reserve price and secondly full amount is taken before seeking confirmation. Jagjit Singh deliberately does not point out above violations during confirmation proceedings.
 e)     D P Ojha does not file valuations on record. Difference between valuations and sale price is amount of misappropriation. Jagjit Singh deliberately does not point out concealment of valuations which proves deriving personal benefit out of sale of assets of companies in liquidation.

2       Scam is upto Rs 500 crores. Amount can be determined by verification of records of companies in Liquidation. Till date no one has verified the records of companies in liquidation. D P Ojha is rich and influential.       D P Ojha says that no harm can come to him as he pays monthly commission to some persons in High Court including Jagjit Singh who protect his interests.
3.      After I raised heat in above matters by informing this court by my letter Dt 22.1.2014 and previous letters, D P Ojha moved the present OLR 11 of 2014 trying to seek amendments to previous orders of company Judges and proposed changes in norms (R/6) for security agencies by hiding certain facts. I wrote a letter Dt 4.8.2014 to Hon’ble Company Judge copy of which is (enclosed as C-3) with request to hear me or issue notice to me.

4.      Following facts prove connivance of jagjit Singh in fraud, criminal conspiracy in theft and misappropriation of assets of companies in Liquidation by D P Ojha;-

A.      The files of urgent cases are sent to Court a day earlier i.e. they should have been sent on 7.8.2014. I went in morning to Liquidation branch and found that file of OLR 11/2014 was lying on table of Jagjit Singh and had not been sent with other files too chambers/court a day earlier. My letter was still attached with file at top. This itself is prove of his connivance with D P Ojha as he did not wanted the judge to read my letter before hearing the matter. 

B.      Then following conversation then took place with Jagjit Singh;-

KD Aggarwal;    “I have being pointing out since 2009 that no security guards are ever appointed in any case have I been able to prove this since then.”
Jagjit Singh;      “Yes it has been proved, but I am not involved.” (He is defending himself without any allegation on him which itself is proof of admission of his guilt.)
KD Aggarwal;    “Have I been able to proof theft of assets in all cases.”
Jagjit Singh;      “Yes it has been proved, but I am not taking any money from D P Ojha.” (He is defending himself without any allegation on him which itself is proof of admission of his guilt.)
KD Aggarwal;    “Non preparation of inventory at time of possession, Is’nt it shocking?”
Jagjit Singh;      “What do you want?”
KD Aggarwal;    “Have you read my letter?”
Jagjit Singh;      “Yes I have read.”
KD Aggarwal;    “Have you read OLR 11/2014.”
Jagjit Singh;      “Yes I have read.”
KD Aggarwal;    “In R/6, D P Ojha now wants the previous orders to be amended regarding ID proofs and inventory and seriatim. Is’nt it shocking?”
Jagjit Singh;      “I have seen everything. All the orders that you have mentioned have been attached by D P Ojha and D P Ojha is not seeking any change in norms? Just consolidation at one place. I will point out your letter during hearing.”
KD Aggarwal;    (According to my information certain crucial norms were sought to be changed / removed altogether by concealing certain orders/letters/facts so then I asked him) “Alright, you have been saying that you are honest and not part of liquidation scam, show me from OLR that D P Ojha has attached orders of Justice N K Sud Dt 30.10.2003 and circulation of letter Dt 15.9.2003 i.e. previous norms, orders of Justice S S Nijjar and also show me from Annexure 6 that norms regarding (a)- preparation of inventory at time of possession, (b) submission of ID proofs of security guards at time of engagement (c) seriatim appointment of security agency and suggestions of Justice N K Sud about time bound direction for sale (all of which are the core of security of assets of companies in liquidation) are in the proposal R/6 made by him. This will prove you to be honest and I can go home and sleep firm in belief that nothing wrong will happen.”
Jagjit Singh;      (At this, he got enraged, he started shouting, abusing and threatening me. He said “You get out from MY Branch, who are you to interfere in my functioning?. Tere khilaaf mein action kara deanga. Tun kutt khani hai meton” Teri vigilance inquiry kara deanga, main bahut powerful hain”. He used such words which I do not want to write, he had completely lost his mind and temper. I left so as not to precipitate matter further. I am informed that later he was instigating other staff members to file a counter complaint against me as he knows that I will be informing this incident to authorities. It is better that CCTV Cameras be installed in branches to keep watch on corrupt, violent and abusive staff/others.

C)     It is evident that Jagjit Singh is part of nexus indulging in theft of assets, misappropriation of property and public funds in league with D P Ojha which is proved when he lied. The orders of Justice N K Sud Dt 30.10.2003, circulation of letter Dt 15.9.2003, orders of Justice S S Nijjar which I wanted him to show and which Jagjit Singh said are on file of OLR 11/2014 may not be on file of OLR 11/2014, The norms which I wanted him to show and which Jagjit Singh said are part of R/6 i.e. norms regarding (a)- preparation of inventory at time of possession, (b) submission of ID proofs of security guards at time of engagement (c) seriatim appointment of security agency and suggested time bound direction for sale (all of which are the core to security of assets of companies in liquidation) may not be actually part of R/6. Since he had indulged in falsification and outright lies, hence got enraged when I challenged him to show from records that what he was saying is true His words and actions never match. he is/was indulging in falsification and lies.
D)     Jagjit Singh was the reader of company matters. Company matters began at 3 PM, I remained sitting in the court the entire time. When the matter No 110 came-up for hearing, jagjit Singh concealed my letter Dt 4.8.2014 from the Judge. (I was not a party so I could not say anything).

E)     Concealment of material facts/ letters/norms and outright lies/ falsification about contents of OLR 11/2014 and annexure R/6, language, threats, criminal intimidation are proof of theft. Misappropriation, embezzlement of assets of and public funds of companies in Liquidation and misbehaviors amounting to moral turpitude. He can afford to lose the job as he has made personal benefit by sharing commissions from theft, misappropriation and embezzlement of assets. of companies in Liquidation. He was enraged that I knew about some of the contents of OLR 11/2014.

5.      He concealed my letter Dt 4.8.2014 and previous material orders of Justice N K Sud alongwith norms circulated by Letter Dt 15.9.2014 and orders of Justice SS Nijjar etc which would have thrown light on real motive of D P Ojha in moving OLR 11/14. Above orders which I had requested the branch to attach with my letter could have been very material in assisting the Company Judge in lifting the veil and exposing the nefarious intentions of D P Ojha in making OLR 11/ of 2014 which actually seek amendment of previous orders on the same subject. Perusal of previous norms and orders of Justice N K Sud and justice SS Nijjar could have scuttled the very attempt of D P Ojha in asking for the amendments of previous orders. He has said that there are difficulties in previous norms without mentioning what is difficulty in (a)- preparation of inventory, (b) submission of ID proofs of security guard (c) seriatim appointment of security agency and suggested time bound direction for sale (all of which are the core of matter of security of assets of companies in liquidation) alleged difficulties were as fictitious as the like fictitious security guards which D P Ojha falsely created to get rid of earlier orders/norms already circulated and make this court a party in the fraud and misappropriation of assets of companies in liquidation about which I have been writing since 2009. I am an expert in the matter of Official Liquidator and copy of letter written by Insolvency section, Ministry of corporate affairs, Govt of India seeking my suggestions about office of official liquidator and their manual is enclosed as C-4. Predecessor of Company Judge i.e. Justice Rajiv N. Raina had barred jagjit Singh from handling judicial/court files.

It is therefore prayed;-

1.      Action be taken against Jagjit Singh for interfering in the administration of Justice. Sec 2c of Contempt of Courts Act states;
2 (c) criminal contempt" means the publication (whether by words. spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representations, or otherwise) of any matter or the doing of any other act whatsoever which-
(i) scandalises or tends to scandalise, or lowers or tends to lower the authority of, any court; or
(ii) prejudices, or interferes or tends to interfere with, the due course of any judicial proceeding; or
(iii) interferes or tends to interfere with, or obstructs or tends to obstruct, the administration of justice in any other manner;
2.      Such disciplinary action be taken against Jagjit Singh as deemed fit.

                                          KD Aggarwal
                                          Advocate.