The accident in my life;
Gopal Singhal Son of Jagan Nath - Jagan Jewelers, Sec 26, Chandigarh
Following is part of Public Records
contained in Criminal Appeal 712 of 2001 in High court of New Delhi; Judge Murlidhar dismissed it without quoting pleadings facts evidence Or Constitution and IPC by saying it is delaying tactic. Wow.
1. That the
Gopal appeared as witness in HMA case titled Rajni Aggarwal V/S Kapil Dev
Aggarwal in the court of Sh. S. S. Lamba, ADJ Chandigarh. While appearing as PW
2 on behalf of the Rajni, on 16.3.98 he swore to state the truth but however he
made various statements in the Court which were false and which he knew to be
false to his knowledge. He thus committed an offence by deliberately
giving false evidence. The statements which were made by the Gopal under
oath knowing them to be false are as reproduced hereunder:-
2. That the
Gopal Singal made the following false statement before this court.
"I cannot tell the exact amount
of initial capital invested in my company (M/s Gopal Sales Pvt. Ltd.).
The company started in April nineteen something.
I do not remember the exact year. I do not
remember the amount invested by me personally in the company. However, it is
wrong to suggest that it was only Rs. 7000/-. I can neither deny nor admit that
I took Rs. 10.00 Lacs from Raj Singal as loan for
investment in the company. Similarly I cannot tell the exact amount
of loan taken from Brij Singal. It may or may not be Rs 5.00 Lacs. It is
wrong to suggest that it was taken over by Mr. Raj
Singal because I could not return the loan taken by the company. It is
wrong to suggest that the company was in financial crisis and
I sought financial help from my sister Rajni."
Proof
of falsity.
Gopal had independently started his
business venture in the name of Gopal Sales Pvt, Limited. No person can
forget so easily and so soon the first business of his life particularly his
own investments, major loans which he took and from which relatives and why the
said business was taken over by those relatives. The statements made above are
apparently false to his own knowledge.
4. Gopal
knowingly and deliberately made the following false statement regarding Rajni
before this court under oath " I cannot say whether my sister knows car
driving or not. I have not seen her driving. I do not know whether my sister
was having a valid car driving license before marriage or not."
Proof
of falsity.
The driving license of the Rajni is
exhibit D 15 on record which has been admitted by his father. This license was
issued on 6.2.89. Rajni was married on 14.4.93. Thus, for full 4
years prior to marriage the Rajni was driving the family car having a valid car
driving license. It is false if her brother says he does not know whether
Rajni drives a car or not or that he has never seen her driving. The Gopal has
knowingly made a false statement as submitted above.
5. The Gopal
has deliberately made the following false statement:- "I cannot recognize
the handwriting of my father."
Proof
of Falsity;
Gopal has all along lived with his
father and always worked under him and on the date of evidence was working
under him. The statement made by him is apparently false to his
knowledge.
6. The Gopal
has further knowingly made following false statements-"It is wrong to
suggest that on receiving a telephone from
the Rajni I along with my father, Brij Singal, Cousin Pardeep and
my mother with some laborers came to the house of the me
I and forcible removed all house hold goods most
of which were self acquired by the Kapil and ransacked the
house and misbehaved with him. it is also wrong to suggest that the
Rajni went with us. It is also wrong to suggest that the Rajni after leaving
his house with us operated the locker in Sector 37 in
the Company of Mr. Brij Singal and removed all the valuable
worth more than Rs.30.00 lacs lying in the said
locker. It is incorrect to suggest that all the
valuable including ancestral gold of Kapil and his parents
was sold off to repay the debts incurred by me for starting the
company Gopal Sales Pvt.Ltd. It is incorrect to suggest that I did not
give any gift to the Rajni. It is wrong to suggest we never went to Kapil’s
houses by taking a Panchayat. It is wrong to suggest that I have deposed
falsely for my own personal financial
gains".
Proof
of falsity.
Testimony of Late Sh.B.L.Premi,
Assistant Branch
Manager, PNB Sector 37, Chandigarh.
Testimony of Dr. Inderjit Dewan.
Prof.Emeritus.
Testimony of Sh.S.K.Mishrk.
Testimony of Sh.Pavitar Kumar.
What happened in Appeal.
KAPIL
DEV AGGARWAL.
